Literature DB >> 11122589

Gender disparities in the receipt of home care for elderly people with disability in the United States.

S J Katz1, M Kabeto, K M Langa.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Projected demographic shifts in the US population over the next 50 years will cause families, health care practitioners, and policymakers to confront a marked increase in the number of people with disabilities living in the community. Concerns about the adequacy of community support are particularly salient to women, who make up a disproportionate number of disabled elderly people and who may be particularly vulnerable because they are more likely to live alone with limited financial resources.
OBJECTIVE: To address gender differences in receipt of informal and formal home care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Nationally representative survey conducted in 1993 among 7443 noninstitutionalized people (4538 women and 2905 men) aged 70 years or older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of hours per week of informal (generally unpaid) and formal (generally paid) home care received by survey participants who reported any activity of daily living (ADL) or instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) impairment (n = 3109) compared by gender and living arrangement and controlling for other factors.
RESULTS: Compared with disabled men, disabled women were much more likely to be living alone (45.4% vs 16.8%, P<.001) and much less likely to be living with a spouse (27.8% vs 73.6%, P<.001). Overall, women received fewer hours of informal care per week than men (15.7 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5-16.9 vs 21.2 hours; 95% CI, 19. 7-22.8). Married disabled women received many fewer hours per week of informal home care than married disabled men (14.8 hours; 95% CI, 13.7-15.8 vs 26.2 hours; 95% CI, 24.6-27.9). Children (>80% women) were the dominant caregivers for disabled women while wives were the dominant caregivers of disabled men. Gender differences in formal home care were small (2.8 hours for women; 95% CI, 2.5-3.1 vs 2.1 hours for men; 95% CI, 1.7-2.4).
CONCLUSION: Large gender disparities appear to exist in the receipt of informal home care for disabled elderly people in the United States, even within married households. Programs providing home care support for disabled elderly people need to consider these large gender disparities and the burden they impose on families when developing intervention strategies in the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11122589     DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.23.3022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  45 in total

1.  Longitudinal changes in disabled husbands' and wives' receipt of care.

Authors:  Claire Noël-Miller
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2010-04-09

2.  The Magnitude, Share and Determinants of Private Costs Incurred by Clients (and Their Caregivers) of In-home Publicly Financed Care.

Authors:  Vivian W Leong; Denise N Guerriere; Ruth Croxford; Peter C Coyte
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2007-08

3.  Does Gender Moderate Factors Associated with Whether Spouses Are the Sole Providers of IADL Care to Their Partners?

Authors:  Sheila Feld; Ruth E Dunkle; Tracy Schroepfer; Huei-Wern Shen
Journal:  Res Aging       Date:  2010-07-01

4.  The role of collective efficacy in exercise adherence: a qualitative study of spousal support and type 2 diabetes management.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Beverly; Linda A Wray
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2008-06-16

5.  Partner caregiving in older cohabiting couples.

Authors:  Claire M Noël-Miller
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Formal and informal care for disabled elderly living in the community: an appraisal of French care composition and costs.

Authors:  Alain Paraponaris; Bérengère Davin; Pierre Verger
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-03-13

7.  Leveraging the health and retirement study to advance palliative care research.

Authors:  Amy S Kelley; Kenneth M Langa; Alexander K Smith; John Cagle; Katherine Ornstein; Maria J Silveira; Lauren Nicholas; Kenneth E Covinsky; Christine S Ritchie
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Comparing reports from hip-fracture patients and their proxies: implications on evaluating sex differences in disability and depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Michelle Shardell; Dawn E Alley; Ram R Miller; Gregory E Hicks; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2011-12-29

9.  [Health problems also explain social services use in home care].

Authors:  Joan Gené Badia; Joan Carles Contel Segura; Antonio Hidalgo García; Alícia Borràs Santos; Montserrat Porta Borges; Anna Oliver Olius; Montse Saus Arus; Carlos Ascaso Terren; Martiño Piñeiro González; Francisco Cegri Lombardo; Esther Limón Ramírez; Antonio Aranzana Martínez; Antonio Heras Tebar; Ramón Noguera Rodríguez; Roser Pedret Llaberia; Manuel Borrell Muñoz; M Dolors Camprubí Casellas; Jacinto Ortiz Molina; Jaume Martín Royo; Susana Gonzalez Martinez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.137

10.  Factors associated with home discharge after rehabilitation among male veterans with lower extremity amputation.

Authors:  Jibby E Kurichi; Diane Cowper Ripley; Dawei Xie; Pui L Kwong; Barbara E Bates; Margaret G Stineman
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.