Literature DB >> 11120595

Restraint-induced modulation of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis in male and female B6.129 mice.

M S Flint1, D B Miller, S S Tinkle.   

Abstract

Recent studies in rats have indicated that acute restraint enhances cutaneous hypersensitivity. We hypothesized that acute restraint would also modulate the development of allergic and irritant dermatitis in mice and that these restraint-induced changes would be reflected in the cutaneous cytokine profile and be gender-specific. For these studies, male and female B6.129 mice were sensitized and challenged with the contact sensitizer dinitrofluorobenzene or challenged with the irritant croton oil. Two-hour restraint was applied prior to chemical challenge. Restraint combined with chemical increased ear swelling in both genders in ACD, a change that was blocked by administration of RU-486 prior to restraint. Neither restraint nor RU-486 administration modulated development of ICD; however, IL-1beta was decreased by restraint in females only. TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma production were modified in ACD; TNF-alpha in both genders and IFN-gamma in female mice only. Our data demonstrate that acute restraint increases serum corticosterone in B6.129 male and female mice to comparable levels. Restraint modulated the murine ear swelling in ACD, but not ICD, in both genders, and the change in the ear swelling response and cytokine production were, at least in part, corticosterone-dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11120595     DOI: 10.1006/brbi.2000.0604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Immun        ISSN: 0889-1591            Impact factor:   7.217


  7 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing versus suppressive effects of stress on immune function: implications for immunoprotection and immunopathology.

Authors:  Firdaus S Dhabhar
Journal:  Neuroimmunomodulation       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.492

Review 2.  The short-term stress response - Mother nature's mechanism for enhancing protection and performance under conditions of threat, challenge, and opportunity.

Authors:  Firdaus S Dhabhar
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 8.606

Review 3.  Effects of stress on immune function: the good, the bad, and the beautiful.

Authors:  Firdaus S Dhabhar
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.829

4.  Enhancing versus Suppressive Effects of Stress on Immune Function: Implications for Immunoprotection versus Immunopathology.

Authors:  Firdaus S Dhabhar
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.406

5.  Involvement of L-selectin in contact hypersensitivity responses augmented by auditory stress.

Authors:  Sang Jae Bae; Kazuhiro Shimizu; Mariko Yozaki; Toshifumi Yamaoka; Yuichiro Akiyama; Ayumi Yoshizaki; Eiji Muroi; Toshihide Hara; Fumihide Ogawa; Shinichi Sato
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Stress hormones reduce the efficacy of paclitaxel in triple negative breast cancer through induction of DNA damage.

Authors:  A Reeder; M Attar; L Nazario; C Bathula; A Zhang; D Hochbaum; E Roy; K L Cooper; S Oesterreich; N E Davidson; C A Neumann; M S Flint
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Psychological Stress and the Cutaneous Immune Response: Roles of the HPA Axis and the Sympathetic Nervous System in Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis.

Authors:  Jessica M F Hall; Desanges Cruser; Alan Podawiltz; Diana I Mummert; Harlan Jones; Mark E Mummert
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2012-08-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.