Literature DB >> 11120440

Sex differences in response to red and blue light in human primary visual cortex: a bold fMRI study.

R L Cowan1, B B Frederick, M Rainey, J M Levin, L C Maas, J Bang, J Hennen, S E Lukas, P F Renshaw.   

Abstract

Studies using a variety of investigative methods, including functional brain imaging and electroencephalography (EEG), have suggested that changes in central nervous system (CNS) dopamine function result in altered visual system processing. The discovery of abnormal retinal blue cone, but not red cone, electroretinogram in association with cocaine withdrawal and Parkinson's disease suggests that visual system response to blue light might be a marker for CNS dopamine tone. As there are numerous sex-related differences in central nervous system dopamine function, we predicted that blue and red light stimulation would produce sex-specific patterns of response in primary visual cortex when studied using the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technique. We analyzed the BOLD response to red and blue light in male and female human volunteers (N=20). Red and blue light responses in primary visual cortex (V1) to stepped intensities of red and blue light were compared by sex for threshold to detectable BOLD signal increase and for stimulus intensity vs. BOLD signal response. Near threshold, males and females showed similar BOLD signal change to red light, but males showed a threefold greater increase (0.52%) to blue light stimulation when compared to females (0.14%). Log-linear regression modeling revealed that the slope coefficients for the red light stimulus intensity vs. signal change curve were not significantly different for males and females (z=0.995, P=0.320), whereas the slope coefficients for the blue light stimulus intensity vs. signal change curve were significantly larger in males (z=2.251, P=0.024). These findings support a sex and color-dependent differential pattern of primary visual cortical response to photic stimulation and suggest a method for assessing the influence of specific dopamine agonist/antagonist medications on visual function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11120440     DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4927(00)00074-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  9 in total

1.  Individual differences in light sensitivity affect sleep and circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Sarah L Chellappa
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Human Ecstasy use is associated with increased cortical excitability: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Amy L Bauernfeind; Mary S Dietrich; Jennifer U Blackford; Evonne J Charboneau; James G Lillevig; Christopher J Cannistraci; Neil D Woodward; Aize Cao; Tristan Watkins; Christina R Di Iorio; Carissa Cascio; Ronald M Salomon; Ronald L Cowan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Blue-light effects on saccadic eye movements and attentional disengagement.

Authors:  Hsing-Hao Lee; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Sex differences in sensory gating of the thalamus during auditory interference of visual attention tasks.

Authors:  D Tomasi; L Chang; E C Caparelli; T Ernst
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Color-dependent changes in humans during a verbal fluency task under colored light exposure assessed by SPA-fNIRS.

Authors:  Hamoon Zohdi; Rahel Egli; Daniel Guthruf; Felix Scholkmann; Ursula Wolf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Color naming deficits and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a retinal dopaminergic hypothesis.

Authors:  Rosemary Tannock; Tobias Banaschewski; David Gold
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 3.759

7.  Gender differences in cerebral metabolism for color processing in mice: A PET/MRI Study.

Authors:  Philip C Njemanze; Mathias Kranz; Mario Amend; Jens Hauser; Hans Wehrl; Peter Brust
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sex differences in light sensitivity impact on brightness perception, vigilant attention and sleep in humans.

Authors:  Sarah L Chellappa; Roland Steiner; Peter Oelhafen; Christian Cajochen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Exercise on Individual's Physiological, Psychological and Rehabilitative Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jiali Qian; Daniel J McDonough; Zan Gao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.