Literature DB >> 11119076

Selection of a polyurethane membrane for the manufacture of ventricles for a totally implantable artificial heart: blood compatibility and biocompatibility studies.

M C Bélanger1, Y Marois, R Roy, Y Mehri, E Wagner, Z Zhang, M W King, M Yang, C Hahn, R Guidoin.   

Abstract

Membranes made from 4 commercial poly(carbonate urethanes): Carbothane (CB), Chronoflex (CF), Corethane 80A (CT80), and Corethane 55D (CT55), and from 2 poly(ether urethanes): Tecoflex (TF) and Tecothane (TT) were prepared by solution casting and sterilized by either ethylene oxide (EO) or gamma radiation. Their biocompatibility was evaluated in vitro in terms of proliferation, cell viability, and adhesion characteristics of human umbilical veins (HUVEC), monocytes (THP-1), and skin fibroblasts, and by measuring complement activation through the generation of the C3a complex. Their hemocompatibility was determined by measuring the level of radiolabeled platelet, neutrophil, and fibrin adhesion in an ex vivo arteriovenous circuit study in piglets as well as via an in vitro hemolysis test. The results of this study showed no endothelial cell proliferation on any of the materials. The cell viability study revealed that the CB, CF, and TF membranes sterilized by EO maintained the highest percentage of monocyte viability after 72 h of incubation (>70%) while none of the gamma-sterilized membranes displayed any cell viability. The fibroblast adhesion and C3a generation assays revealed that none of the materials supported any cell adhesion or activated complement, regardless of the sterilization method. The hemolysis test also confirmed that the 4 poly(carbonate urethanes) were hemolytic while none of the poly(ether urethanes) were. Finally, the ex vivo study revealed that significantly more platelets adhered to the CB and CT55 membranes while the levels of neutrophil and fibrin deposition were observed to be similar for all 6 materials. In conclusion, the study identified the CF and TF membranes as having superior biocompatibility and hemocompatibility compared to the other polyurethanes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11119076     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06504.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  10 in total

1.  Novel electrospun polyurethane/gelatin composite meshes for vascular grafts.

Authors:  Nicola Detta; Cesare Errico; Dinuccio Dinucci; Dario Puppi; David A Clarke; Gwendolen C Reilly; Federica Chiellini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Characterization and biocompatibility studies of new degradable poly(urea)urethanes prepared with arginine, glycine or aspartic acid as chain extenders.

Authors:  L H Chan-Chan; C Tkaczyk; R F Vargas-Coronado; J M Cervantes-Uc; M Tabrizian; J V Cauich-Rodriguez
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Fatty acid-based polyurethane films for wound dressing applications.

Authors:  Guncem Gultekin; Cigdem Atalay-Oral; Sibel Erkal; Fikret Sahin; Djursun Karastova; S Birgul Tantekin-Ersolmaz; F Seniha Guner
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Cytotoxic effects exerted by polyarylsulfone dialyser membranes depend on different sterilization processes.

Authors:  Emna El Golli-Bennour; Bochra Kouidhi; Mouna Dey; Rabia Younes; Chayma Bouaziz; Chiraz Zaied; Hassen Bacha; Addellatif Achour
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Hemocompatibility of polymeric nanostructured surfaces.

Authors:  Victoria Leszczak; Barbara S Smith; Ketul C Popat
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.517

6.  Catheterless long-term ambulatory urodynamic measurement using a novel three-device system.

Authors:  Sebastian Wille; Pauline Schumacher; Jenny Paas; Dirk Tenholte; Okyaz Eminaga; Ute Müller; Noemi Muthen; Jan Mehner; Oliver Cornely; Udo Engelmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Addressing the Inflammatory Response to Clinically Relevant Polymers by Manipulating the Host Response Using ITIM Domain-Containing Receptors.

Authors:  Joshua B Slee; Abigail J Christian; Robert J Levy; Stanley J Stachelek
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  Clinical performance of an elastomeric lumbar disc replacement: Minimum 12 months follow-up.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Raul Springmuller; Casey K Lee; Leonardo Oliveira; Sandra E Roth; William F Ogilvie
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-03-01

9.  Effect of Immobilized Antithrombin III on the Thromboresistance of Polycarbonate Urethane.

Authors:  Karin Lukas; Karin Stadtherr; Andre Gessner; Daniel Wehner; Thomas Schmid; Hans Peter Wendel; Christof Schmid; Karla Lehle
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  In vitro Endothelialization and Platelet Adhesion on Titaniferous Upgraded Polyether and Polycarbonate Polyurethanes.

Authors:  Karla Lehle; Jing Li; Hanngörg Zimmermann; Björn Hartmann; Daniel Wehner; Thomas Schmid; Christof Schmid
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.