Literature DB >> 11118017

Prandial glucose effectiveness and fasting gluconeogenesis in insulin-resistant first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes.

M F Nielsen1, B Nyholm, A Caumo, V Chandramouli, W C Schumann, C Cobelli, B R Landau, R A Rizza, O Schmitz.   

Abstract

Impaired glucose effectiveness (i.e., a diminished ability of glucose per se to facilitate its own metabolism), increased gluconeogenesis, and endogenous glucose release are, together with insulin resistance and beta-cell abnormalities, established features of type 2 diabetes. To explore aspects of the pathophysiology behind type 2 diabetes, we assessed in a group of healthy people prone to develop type 2 diabetes (n = 23), namely first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetic patients (FDR), 1) endogenous glucose release and fasting gluconeogenesis measured using the 2H2O technique and 2) glucose effectiveness. The FDR group was insulin resistant when compared with an age-, sex-, and BMI-matched control group without a family history of type 2 diabetes (n = 14) (M value, clamp: 6.07 +/- 0.48 vs. 8.06 +/- 0.69 mg x kg(-1) lean body weight (lbw) x min(-1); P = 0.02). Fasting rates of gluconeogenesis (1.28 +/- 0.06 vs. 1.41 +/- 0.07 mg x kg(-1) lbw x min(-1); FDR vs. control subjects, P = 0.18) did not differ in the two groups and accounted for 53 +/- 2 and 60 +/- 3% of total endogenous glucose release. Glucose effectiveness was examined using a combined somatostatin and insulin infusion (0.17 vs. 0.14 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1), FDR vs. control subjects), the latter replacing serum insulin at near baseline levels. In addition, a 360-min labeled glucose infusion was given to simulate a prandial glucose profile. After glucose infusion, the integrated plasma glucose response above baseline (1,817 +/- 94 vs. 1,789 +/- 141 mmol/l per 6 h), the ability of glucose to simulate its own uptake (1.50 +/- 0.13 vs. 1.32 +/- 0.16 ml x kg(-1) lbw x min(-1)), and the ability of glucose per se to suppress endogenous glucose release did not differ between the FDR and control group. In conclusion, in contrast to overt type 2 diabetic patients, healthy people at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes are characterized by normal glucose effectiveness at near-basal insulinemia and normal fasting rates of gluconeogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11118017     DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes        ISSN: 0012-1797            Impact factor:   9.461


  5 in total

Review 1.  The forgotten role of glucose effectiveness in the regulation of glucose tolerance.

Authors:  Simmi Dube; Isabel Errazuriz-Cruzat; Ananda Basu; Rita Basu
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Failure of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia to compensate for impaired metabolic response to an oral glucose load.

Authors:  M Hussain; M Janghorbani; S Schuette; R V Considine; R L Chisholm; K J Mather
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 2.852

3.  Glucagon supports postabsorptive plasma glucose concentrations in humans with biologically optimal insulin levels.

Authors:  Benjamin A Cooperberg; Philip E Cryer
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 9.461

4.  Altered hepatic glucose homeostasis in AnxA6-KO mice fed a high-fat diet.

Authors:  Rose Cairns; Alexander W Fischer; Patricia Blanco-Munoz; Anna Alvarez-Guaita; Elsa Meneses-Salas; Antonia Egert; Christa Buechler; Andrew J Hoy; Joerg Heeren; Carlos Enrich; Carles Rentero; Thomas Grewal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Impact of 9 days of bed rest on hepatic and peripheral insulin action, insulin secretion, and whole-body lipolysis in healthy young male offspring of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Amra C Alibegovic; Lise Højbjerre; Mette P Sonne; Gerrit van Hall; Bente Stallknecht; Flemming Dela; Allan Vaag
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 9.461

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.