Literature DB >> 11117654

Effect of zanamivir on duration and resolution of influenza symptoms.

A S Monto1, A B Moult, S J Sharp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Zanamivir is a neuraminidase inhibitor, the first of a new class of drugs with potent, specific antiviral activity against influenza A and B. Administration by inhalation results in direct delivery to the respiratory tract, the principal site of viral replication.
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of zanamivir on duration and resolution of influenza symptoms.
METHODS: Using a method similar to that employed in amantadine treatment studies to obtain supporting evidence of efficacy for US Food and Drug Administration consideration, pooled data from 6 zanamivir phase II and III clinical trials involving primarily previously healthy adults were analyzed to categorize patients as accelerated resolvers (temperature <37.8 degrees C < or = 24 hours after dosing, plus a > or = 50% reduction in symptom score by 36 hours), early resolvers (temperature <37.8 degrees C < or = 36 hours after dosing), and nonaccelerated resolvers (febrile >36 hours after dosing). Patients in the accelerated and early categories were termed rapid resolvers; the others were slow resolvers. Patients recorded their symptom severity, temperature, ability to perform normal daily activities, and use of relief medication on a diary card. The primary end point of median time to alleviation of symptoms was also reexamined, with the additional requirement that patients were not taking relief medication when their symptoms were alleviated. This analysis was intended to control for the possible effect of relief medication on the primary end point.
RESULTS: In the influenza-positive population (n = 1572), significantly more zanamivir-treated patients were rapid resolvers compared with those receiving placebo (807 [72%] vs 765 [64%], P < 0.001). Significant benefits of zanamivir treatment were observed in patients with a baseline temperature of > or = 37.8 degrees C (630 [68%] vs 595 [57%], P < 0.001) or > or = 38.3 degrees C (382 [67%] vs 365 [52%], P < 0.001) and in patients considered by their physi- cian to have severe symptoms at the start of therapy (252 [70%] vs 222 [63%], P = 0.02). Differences were even more apparent in patients with high-risk conditions (74% vs 53%, P = 0.014) and in those aged > or = 50 years (70% vs 54%, P = 0.005). Zanamivir treatment was also associated with a significant reduction in time to alleviation of symptoms with no use of relief medication. This was particularly noticeable in those aged > or = 50 years; time to alleviation was 13 days in patients receiving placebo and 6 days in patients receiving zanamivir (P < 0.001). In these trials, adverse events were reported at a similar frequency in patients receiving zanamivir and those receiving placebo.
CONCLUSIONS: Zanamivir is more effective than placebo in patients with influenza at providing early symptom relief and a reduced duration of illness at a time when use of relief medication has ended. These benefits are seen across different patient groups but appear to be particularly marked in patients who are aged > or = 50 years, who have underlying illnesses, who are considered high risk, or who are more severely ill at the beginning of therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11117654     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)83026-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  15 in total

Review 1.  Influenza vaccines: present and future.

Authors:  Peter Palese; Adolfo García-Sastre
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Pharmacokinetics of MHAA4549A, an Anti-Influenza A Monoclonal Antibody, in Healthy Subjects Challenged with Influenza A Virus in a Phase IIa Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Rong Deng; Ai Ping Lee; Mauricio Maia; Jeremy J Lim; Tracy Burgess; Priscilla Horn; Michael A Derby; Elizabeth Newton; Jorge A Tavel; William D Hanley
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Phase 2 Randomized Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of MHAA4549A, a Broadly Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody, in a Human Influenza A Virus Challenge Model.

Authors:  Jacqueline M McBride; Jeremy J Lim; Tracy Burgess; Rong Deng; Michael A Derby; Mauricio Maia; Priscilla Horn; Omer Siddiqui; Daniel Sheinson; Haiyin Chen-Harris; Elizabeth M Newton; Dimitri Fillos; Denise Nazzal; Carrie M Rosenberger; Maikke B Ohlson; Rob Lambkin-Williams; Hosnieh Fathi; Jeffrey M Harris; Jorge A Tavel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Zanamivir: an update of its use in influenza.

Authors:  Susan M Cheer; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  A Phase 1, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Ascending-Dose Study To Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of an Anti-Influenza B Virus Monoclonal Antibody, MHAB5553A, in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Jeremy J Lim; Michael A Derby; Yaping Zhang; Rong Deng; Richard Larouche; Malia Anderson; Mauricio Maia; Stéphanie Carrier; Isabelle Pelletier; Johanne Girard; Priya Kulkarni; Elizabeth Newton; Jorge A Tavel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Intravenous peramivir for treatment of influenza A and B virus infection in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Shigeru Kohno; Hiroshi Kida; Masashi Mizuguchi; Nobuo Hirotsu; Tadashi Ishida; Junichi Kadota; Jingoro Shimada
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Antigen-specific H1N1 influenza antibody responses in acute respiratory tract infections and their relation to influenza infection and disease course.

Authors:  John Patrick Haran; David C Hoaglin; Huaiqing Chen; Edward W Boyer; Shan Lu
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 8.  Current research on respiratory viral infections: Fourth International Symposium.

Authors:  Michael G Ison; John Mills; Peter Openshaw; Maria Zambon; Albert Osterhaus; Frederick Hayden
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.970

9.  A cost-benefit analysis of testing for influenza A in high-risk adults.

Authors:  William J Hueston; Joseph J Benich
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Preclinical pharmacokinetics of MHAA4549A, a human monoclonal antibody to influenza A virus, and the prediction of its efficacious clinical dose for the treatment of patients hospitalized with influenza A.

Authors:  Priyanka Gupta; Amrita V Kamath; Summer Park; Henry Chiu; Jeff Lutman; Mauricio Maia; Man-Wah Tan; Min Xu; Lee Swem; Rong Deng
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.