Literature DB >> 11117638

Comparative study of three culture systems for optimal recovery of mycobacteria from different clinical specimens.

Z Samra1, L Kaufman, J Bechor, J Bahar.   

Abstract

A new broth-based nonradioactive culture system, MB-Redox (Heipha Diagnostika Biotest, Germany), was compared with the liquid radiometric Bactec 460 TB system and the solid Lowenstein-Jensen (L-J) medium for recovery rate and time to detection of mycobacteria. Of the 605 clinical specimens studied, 100 grew acid-fast bacilli (AFB). The isolation rate for all AFB was 84% for Bactec, 69% for MB-Redox, and 48% for L-J. Eighteen percent of the 100 isolates grew only in Bactec, 10% only in MB-Redox, and 5% only in L-J. The average times to detection of the 100 isolates were 13.2, 17.8, and 28.3 days, respectively, and the mean growth times for the 34 AFB detected by all three media were 13.7, 15.2, and 26.8 days, respectively. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was isolated from 15 clinical samples, with detection times of 16.8 days for Bactec, 18.3 for MB-Redox, and 22.8 days for L-J medium; 10 of these isolates grew in all media, with detection times of 14.2, 16.4, and 18.7 days, respectively. Seven were also positive on direct smear, with detection times of 12.4, 13.7, and 17.7 days. Two of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were recovered only in Bactec and another one only in L-J medium. Mycobacterium haemophilum grew only in the liquid systems, which provided the special growth factors this bacterium requires. Only the combination of all three systems yielded optimal recovery. MB-Redox gave reliable results, offering the advantages of ready-to-use tubes in which the antibiotic supplement is already incorporated and easy and immediate reading of the results. Since this system does not contain any radioactive substance, results can be confirmed with acid-fast staining and conventional and molecular tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11117638     DOI: 10.1007/s100960000369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  5 in total

1.  Mycobacterium haemophilum and lymphadenitis in children.

Authors:  Lesla E S Bruijnesteijn van Coppenraet; Edward J Kuijper; Jerome A Lindeboom; Jan M Prins; Eric C J Claas
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 2.  Revisiting the methods for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis: what has the new millennium brought thus far?

Authors:  Thales Alves Campelo; Paulo Rafael Cardoso de Sousa; Lucas de Lima Nogueira; Cristiane Cunha Frota; Paulo Renato Zuquim Antas
Journal:  Access Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-02

3.  Chlorhexidine decontamination of sputum for culturing Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Shady Asmar; Michel Drancourt
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  Dramatic reduction of culture time of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Ramzi Ghodbane; Didier Raoult; Michel Drancourt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  An electrochemical biosensor for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA from sputum and urine samples.

Authors:  Daniel Ramos-Sono; Raúl Laureano; Daniel Rueda; Robert H Gilman; Adolfo La Rosa; Jesús Ruiz; Raúl León; Patricia Sheen; Mirko Zimic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.