Literature DB >> 11117198

The social organization of fish shoals: a test of the predictive power of laboratory experiments for the field.

J Krause1, R K Butlin, N Peuhkuri, V L Pritchard.   

Abstract

By contrast with a multitude of laboratory studies on the social organization of fish, relatively little is know about the size, composition and dynamics of free-ranging fish shoals. We give an overview of the available information on fish shoals and assess to what degree the predictions made from laboratory studies are consistent with field data. The section on shoal choice behaviour in the laboratory is structured so that the evidence for different shoaling preferences is discussed in the context of their mechanisms and functions. Predictions based on experiments in captivity regarding preferences for conspecifics, individuals of similar body length and unparasitized fish were highly consistent with field observations on free-ranging shoals whereas preferences for familiar conspecifics and kin remain to be conclusively demonstrated in the field. In general, there is a shortage of studies in which shoaling preferences have been investigated both in the laboratory and the field, and field studies have so far been largely descriptive revealing little about the underlying mechanisms of observed patterns. Given the great importance of fish shoals both in fundamental and applied research, an advancement of our knowledge of their social organization should significantly contribute to a better understanding of a whole range of topics including reciprocal altruism, group-living and self-organization.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11117198     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2000.tb00052.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  32 in total

1.  Visual social preferences of lone zebrafish in a novel environment: strain and anxiolytic effects.

Authors:  P A Barba-Escobedo; G G Gould
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.449

2.  Assortative interactions and social networks in fish.

Authors:  D P Croft; R James; A J W Ward; M S Botham; D Mawdsley; J Krause
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-01-29       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Enhanced schooling performance in lateralized fishes.

Authors:  Angelo Bisazza; Marco Dadda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  How sailfish use their bills to capture schooling prey.

Authors:  P Domenici; A D M Wilson; R H J M Kurvers; S Marras; J E Herbert-Read; J F Steffensen; S Krause; P E Viblanc; P Couillaud; J Krause
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Rational choice of social group size in mosquitofish.

Authors:  Luke Reding; Molly E Cummings
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Inferring collective behaviour from a fossilized fish shoal.

Authors:  Nobuaki Mizumoto; Shinya Miyata; Stephen C Pratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Proto-cooperation: group hunting sailfish improve hunting success by alternating attacks on grouping prey.

Authors:  James E Herbert-Read; Pawel Romanczuk; Stefan Krause; Daniel Strömbom; Pierre Couillaud; Paolo Domenici; Ralf H J M Kurvers; Stefano Marras; John F Steffensen; Alexander D M Wilson; Jens Krause
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Within-shoal phenotypic homogeneity affects shoaling preference in a killifish.

Authors:  Silvia Cattelan; Matteo Griggio
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Coordinated and cohesive movement of two small conspecific fish induced by eliciting a simultaneous optomotor response.

Authors:  Haruka Imada; Masahito Hoki; Yuji Suehiro; Teruhiro Okuyama; Daisuke Kurabayashi; Atsuko Shimada; Kiyoshi Naruse; Hiroyuki Takeda; Takeo Kubo; Hideaki Takeuchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Novel acoustic technology for studying free-ranging shark social behaviour by recording individuals' interactions.

Authors:  Tristan L Guttridge; Samuel H Gruber; Jens Krause; David W Sims
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.