Literature DB >> 11116771

Assessing effectiveness of treatment of depression in primary care. Partially randomised preference trial.

N Bedi1, C Chilvers, R Churchill, M Dewey, C Duggan, K Fielding, V Gretton, P Miller, G Harrison, A Lee, I Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a mismatch between the wish of a patient with depression to have counselling and the prescription of antidepressants by the doctor. AIMS: To determine whether counselling is as effective as antidepressants for depression in primary care and whether allowing patients to choose their treatment affects their response.
METHOD: A partially randomised preference trial, with patients randomised to either antidepressants or counselling or given their choice of either treatment. The treatment and follow-up were identical in the randomised and patient preference arms.
RESULTS: There were 103 randomised and 220 preference patients in the trial. We found: no differences in the baseline characteristics of the randomised and preference groups; that the two treatments were equally effective at 8 weeks, both for the randomised group and when the randomised and patient preference groups for a particular treatment were combined; and that expressing a preference for either treatment conferred no additional benefit on outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: These data challenge several assumptions about the most appropriate treatment for depression in a primary care setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11116771     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.177.4.312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  56 in total

1.  Managing depression in primary care.

Authors:  E H Wagner; G E Simon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-31

2.  Antidepressants and counselling for major depression in primary care. Authors' conclusions were not justified by findings.

Authors:  W C Leung
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-04

3.  Postnatal depression and screening: too broad a sweep?

Authors:  Margaret Oates
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Long term sickness absence.

Authors:  Max Henderson; Nicholas Glozier; Kevin Holland Elliott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-09

5.  Attitudes and illness factors associated with low perceived need for depression treatment among young adults.

Authors:  Benjamin W Van Voorhees; Joshua Fogel; Thomas K Houston; Lisa A Cooper; Nae-Yuh Wang; Daniel E Ford
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Jared R Adams; Robert E Drake
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2006-02

7.  Factors associated with attrition from a randomized controlled trial of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Allison J Applebaum; Wendy G Lichtenthal; Hayley A Pessin; Julia N Radomski; N Simay Gökbayrak; Aviva M Katz; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Comorbid chronic illness and the diagnosis and treatment of depression in safety net primary care settings.

Authors:  Chizobam Ani; Mohsen Bazargan; David Hindman; Douglas Bell; Michael Rodriguez; Richard S Baker
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.657

Review 9.  Trust, choice and power in mental health: a literature review.

Authors:  Richard Laugharne; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Towards personalizing treatment for depression : developing treatment values markers.

Authors:  Marsha N Wittink; Knashawn H Morales; Mark Cary; Joseph J Gallo; Stephen J Bartels
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.