E F Rabinowicz1, G Silipo, R Goldman, D C Javitt. 1. Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Rd, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA. rabin@nki.rfhm.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia is associated with large effect-size deficits in auditory sensory processing, as reflected in impaired delayed-tone matching performance. The deficit may reflect either impaired sensory precision, which would be indicative of neural dysfunction within auditory sensory (temporal) regions, or of increased distractibility, which would be indicative of impaired prefrontal function. The present study evaluates susceptibility of schizophrenic subjects to same-modality distraction to determine whether patients fit a "bitemporal" or "prefrontal" model of sensory dysfunction. METHODS: Tone-matching ability was evaluated in 15 first-episode patients, 18 outpatients with chronic illness, and 21 patients in long-term residential care, relative to 32 nonpsychiatric controls of a similar age. A staircase procedure determined individual thresholds for attaining criterion level correct performance. RESULTS: Tone-matching thresholds in the absence of distractors were significantly elevated in patients in long-term residential care relative to all other groups (P<.001). The effect size (d) of the difference relative to controls was extremely large (SD, 1.95). Schizophrenic patients, even those with elevated tone-matching thresholds, showed no increased susceptibility to auditory distraction (P =.42). Deficits in tone-matching performance in subjects with chronic illness could not be attributed to medication status or level of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that sensory processing dysfunction in schizophrenia is particularly severe in a subgroup of patients who can be considered poor-outcome based on their need for long-term residential treatment. Furthermore, the absence of increased auditory distractibility argues against prefrontal dysfunction as an origin for auditory sensory imprecision in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:1149-1155.
BACKGROUND:Schizophrenia is associated with large effect-size deficits in auditory sensory processing, as reflected in impaired delayed-tone matching performance. The deficit may reflect either impaired sensory precision, which would be indicative of neural dysfunction within auditory sensory (temporal) regions, or of increased distractibility, which would be indicative of impaired prefrontal function. The present study evaluates susceptibility of schizophrenic subjects to same-modality distraction to determine whether patients fit a "bitemporal" or "prefrontal" model of sensory dysfunction. METHODS: Tone-matching ability was evaluated in 15 first-episode patients, 18 outpatients with chronic illness, and 21 patients in long-term residential care, relative to 32 nonpsychiatric controls of a similar age. A staircase procedure determined individual thresholds for attaining criterion level correct performance. RESULTS: Tone-matching thresholds in the absence of distractors were significantly elevated in patients in long-term residential care relative to all other groups (P<.001). The effect size (d) of the difference relative to controls was extremely large (SD, 1.95). Schizophrenicpatients, even those with elevated tone-matching thresholds, showed no increased susceptibility to auditory distraction (P =.42). Deficits in tone-matching performance in subjects with chronic illness could not be attributed to medication status or level of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that sensory processing dysfunction in schizophrenia is particularly severe in a subgroup of patients who can be considered poor-outcome based on their need for long-term residential treatment. Furthermore, the absence of increased auditory distractibility argues against prefrontal dysfunction as an origin for auditory sensory imprecision in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:1149-1155.
Authors: James M Gold; Britta Hahn; Wei Wei Zhang; Benjamin M Robinson; Emily S Kappenman; Valerie M Beck; Steven J Luck Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-06
Authors: Caitlin E Moyer; Kristen M Delevich; Kenneth N Fish; Josephine K Asafu-Adjei; Allan R Sampson; Karl-Anton Dorph-Petersen; David A Lewis; Robert A Sweet Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Robert A Sweet; Ruth A Henteleff; Wei Zhang; Allan R Sampson; David A Lewis Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2008-05-07 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: P E Rasser; U Schall; J Todd; P T Michie; P B Ward; P Johnston; K Helmbold; V Case; A Søyland; P A Tooney; P M Thompson Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2009-06-26 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Ulrich Ettinger; Christine Mohr; Diane C Gooding; Alex S Cohen; Alexander Rapp; Corinna Haenschel; Sohee Park Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Victoria M Leavitt; Sophie Molholm; Walter Ritter; Marina Shpaner; John J Foxe Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 6.186