Literature DB >> 11115286

Accuracy of computed tomography in determining the presence or absence of metastatic retropharyngeal adenopathy.

D D Morrissey1, J M Talbot, J I Cohen, M K Wax, P E Andersen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To decide the accuracy of computed tomography in determining the presence or absence of metastatic retropharygeal adenopathy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
DESIGN: A comparison of the results of retrospective blinded review of preoperative computed tomographic scans with the histologic findings of retropharyngeal node dissection at the time of surgery.
SETTING: Academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients with advanced stage squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Computed tomographic findings and histologic results of retropharyngeal node dissection.
RESULTS: The retropharyngeal nodes were pathologically positive for metastasis in 6 (23%) of the 26 patients. The radiologist (J.M.T.) correctly read the scan in 3 of 6 patients with histologically proved metastasis, and in 14 of 20 patients with histologic features negative for metastasis. The sensitivity of the radiologist reading was 50%, and the specificity was 70%. The positive predictive value was 33%, and the negative predictive value was 82%.
CONCLUSION: The presence of retropharyngeal node metastasis cannot be determined by computed tomographic imaging alone. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1478-1481

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11115286     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.126.12.1478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  5 in total

1.  Syncope as a sign of occult malignant recurrence in the retropharyngeal and parapharyngeal space: CT and MR imaging findings in four cases.

Authors:  Mitsuhiko Nakahira; Hiroaki Nakatani; Taizo Takeda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  What the clinician wants to know: surgical perspective and ultrasound for lymph node imaging of the neck.

Authors:  Michiel W M van den Brekel; Jonas A Castelijns
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

3.  The value of CT, MRI, and PET-CT in detecting retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Kim; Kyu Young Choi; Sang-Hyo Lee; Dong Jin Lee; Bum Jung Park; Dae Young Yoon; Young-Soo Rho
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 4.  Prevalence and prognostic impact of retropharyngeal lymph nodes metastases in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Meta-analysis of published literature.

Authors:  Giancarlo Tirelli; Nicoletta Gardenal; Enrico Zanelli; Daniele Borsetto; Veronica Phillips; Alberto Vito Marcuzzo; Jonathan Fussey; Jerry Polesel; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Clinical outcomes of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma and retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis identified by FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Jing-Ren Tseng; Tsung-Ying Ho; Chien-Yu Lin; Li-Yu Lee; Hung-Ming Wang; Chun-Ta Liao; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.