Literature DB >> 11114566

Anterior approach bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse.

R D Cespedes1.   

Abstract

The sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) was first described as a unilateral fixation; however, bilateral fixation, when possible, allows a symmetrical vaginal reconstruction and provides additional vaginal vault support. We evaluated the outcome of treating total vault prolapse using a bilateral SSLF through an anterior vaginal approach. From July 1996 to July 1999, 28 patients (mean age 67) underwent bilateral SSLF procedures through an anterior vaginal approach. All patients had either grade 3 or 4 vault prolapse, and all patients had associated enteroceles, cystoceles, and rectoceles. All patients underwent fluorourodynamic evaluation including an abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) with reduction of the vaginal prolapse. A pubovaginal sling was performed in 25 patients and all 28 patients underwent an anterior colporrhaphy, rectocele, and enterocele repair. A vaginal paravaginal repair was performed in 22 cases. At a mean follow-up of 17 months (range 5 to 35), 27 of 28 patients were cured, 1 patient had an asymptomatic unilateral grade 1 vault prolapse, 2 patients had developed small asymptomatic cystoceles and there had been no recurrence of rectoceles or enteroceles. Stress incontinence had been cured in all patients; however, 2 patients continued to have mild urge incontinence requiring <1 pad per day. Two patients complained of transient gluteal pain. We believe the anterior approach bilateral SSLF is a safe procedure with excellent medium term results in women with grade 3 to 4 vaginal prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11114566     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00919-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  12 in total

Review 1.  Traditional native tissue versus mesh-augmented pelvic organ prolapse repairs: providing an accurate interpretation of current literature.

Authors:  E J Stanford; A Cassidenti; M D Moen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Is standardised vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation a safe teaching procedure for residents?

Authors:  Axel Sauerwald; Inke Bruns; Barbara Peveling; Hendrik Brunke; Friedrich Wolff
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for uterovaginal prolapse: experience with 93 cases.

Authors:  Yanzhou Wang; Dan Wang; Yuyan Li; Zhiqing Liang; Huicheng Xu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Pearls and pitfalls of mesh surgery.

Authors:  Ajay Rane; Jay Iyer
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-01-05

Review 5.  Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard?

Authors:  Ricardo Palmerola; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Vaginal vault prolapse: evaluation and repair.

Authors:  David A Ginsberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.862

8.  How we do an anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Estelle Declas; Geraldine Giraudet; Celine De Graer; Cyril Bengler; Sophie Delplanque; Michel Cosson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Short-term outcomes of the transvaginal minimal mesh procedure for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Naoko Takazawa; Akiko Fujisaki; Yasukuni Yoshimura; Akira Tsujimura; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-02-02

Review 10.  Laparoscopic approach to pelvic organ prolapse - the way to go or a blind alley?

Authors:  Ewelina Malanowska; Marek Soltes; Andrzej Starczewski; Eckhard Petri; Marcin Jozwik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.