Literature DB >> 11113837

Lack of benefit of laxatives as adjunctive therapy for functional nonretentive fecal soiling in children.

R van Ginkel1, M A Benninga, P J Blommaart, R N van der Plas, G E Boeckxstaens, H A Büller, J A Taminiau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the combination of laxative treatment and biofeedback therapy (BF) is more effective for management of functional nonretentive fecal soiling than biofeedback therapy alone. STUDY
DESIGN: In a prospective nonblinded study, 48 children were randomized in 2 groups: treatment with oral laxatives (LAX) and 5 sessions of BF (BF + LAX) or 5 sessions of BF alone (BF) during a treatment intervention period of 7 weeks. Biofeedback was performed with perfused manometry catheters and rectal balloon distension. Training focused on awareness of balloon distension and instruction in correct defecation dynamics. Successful treatment was defined as <1 encopresis episode per 2 weeks.
RESULTS: At the end of the intervention period, the number of encopresis episodes was significantly decreased in both groups: from 7 (2 to 24) to 2 (0 to 17) in the BF group and from 7 (3 to 25) to 2 (0 to 14) in the BF + LAX group. However, children given BF alone had significantly higher success rates than children treated with BF and additional oral laxatives (44% to 11%).
CONCLUSIONS: There is no additional effect of laxative treatment in functional nonretentive fecal soiling. Children treated with BF in combination with laxatives showed a significantly lower success percentage compared with those treated with BF alone. These results suggest that children with functional nonretentive fecal soiling should be treated differently from children with constipation and encopresis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11113837     DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2000.109153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  8 in total

Review 1.  Behavioural and cognitive interventions with or without other treatments for the management of faecal incontinence in children.

Authors:  Miriam Brazzelli; Peter V Griffiths; June D Cody; David Tappin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 2.  Barostat testing in children with functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  Maartje M van den Berg; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Rijk van Ginkel; Hayat M Mousa; Marc A Benninga
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-06

Review 3.  Coexistence of constipation and incontinence in children and adults.

Authors:  S Nurko; S M Scott
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.043

4.  Prognosis of constipation: clinical factors and colonic transit time.

Authors:  F de Lorijn; M P van Wijk; J B Reitsma; R van Ginkel; J A J M Taminiau; M A Benninga
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Management of Fecal Incontinence in Children Without Functional Fecal Retention.

Authors:  Licia Pensabene; Samuel Nurko
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10

6.  Simultaneous urodynamic and anorectal manometry studies in children: insights into the relationship between the lower gastrointestinal and lower urinary tracts.

Authors:  L Ambartsumyan; A Siddiqui; S Bauer; S Nurko
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  Constipation in children.

Authors:  Nadeem A Afzal; Mark P Tighe; Mike A Thomson
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 8.  Bowel management for the treatment of pediatric fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andrea Bischoff; Marc A Levitt; Alberto Peña
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.827

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.