Literature DB >> 11113290

A Pain Monitoring Program for nurses: effect on the administration of analgesics.

Marlies E J de Rond1, Rianne de Wit, Frits S A M van Dam, Martin J Muller.   

Abstract

Both physicians and nurses are responsible for adequate pain management. The aim of this study was to assess pain management behavior of physicians and nurses, and to evaluate the effects of a Pain Monitoring Program for nurses on the extent to which nurses administer analgesics. The Pain Monitoring Program consisted of two components: educating nurses about pain, pain assessment and pain management; and implementing daily pain assessment by means of a numeric rating scale. Several outcomes were distinguished to evaluate the administration of analgesics by nurses: the prescribed analgesics by physicians, the administered analgesics by nurses, and the discrepancy between the ordered and the administered analgesics. The effects of the Pain Monitoring Program on these outcomes were measured in a quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group. In total, 703 patients participated: 358 patients in the control group and 345 in the intervention group. Patients were interviewed twice, i.e. at the beginning and at the end of hospitalization. Results of the control group showed that at the first interview 70% of the patients were prescribed analgesics by physicians and only 74% of those patients were actually administered analgesics by nurses. Consequently, 50% of the patients in pain received analgesics. The administered analgesics was in absolute agreement with the prescribed analgesics in 60% of the patients with routine analgesics and in 85% of the patients with PRN analgesics. The relative difference between ordered and administered routine analgesics was small, namely 15% for opioids and 20% for non-opioids. Similar results of the control group were found for the second interview. In addition, the results showed that the Pain Monitoring Program was effective in improving nurses' administration of analgesics. At the first interview more patients received analgesics that were prescribed on a PRN basis and the doses of administered routine non-opioids including PRN increased. At the time of the second interview, more patients received weak opioids. The Pain Monitoring Program was especially effective in patients with moderate to severe pain. However, the discrepancy between the analgesics ordered by physicians and actually administered by nurses did not change as a result of the Pain Monitoring Program. Based on this study it can be concluded that the use of a simple method such as a numeric rating scale together with pain education for nurses is effective in improving the administration of analgesics by nurses. These are important results because nurses play an essential role in helping patients to cope with their pain. Because the Pain Monitoring Program (PMP) was effective in a heterogeneous population in multiple care settings, the possibility of implementing the PMP in routine nursing practice should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11113290     DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00344-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  6 in total

1.  Satisfaction rate of patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy as day-case surgery compared to conventional hospitalization: a prospective non-randomized study.

Authors:  Rachid Badaoui; Lionel Rebibo; Kahina Kirat; Youssef Alami; Abdelhakim Hchikat; Cyril Cosse; Jean-Marc Regimbeau; Emmanuel Lorne
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  [Ethic charter of the German Society for the Study of Pain (DGSS)].

Authors:  S Reiter-Theil; T Graf-Baumann; K Kutzer; H C Müller-Busch; R Stutzki; H C Traue; A Willweber-Strumpf; M Zimmermann; M Zenz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Rationale, design, and implementation protocol of the Dutch clinical practice guideline pain in patients with cancer: a cluster randomised controlled trial with Short Message Service (SMS) and Interactive Voice Response (IVR).

Authors:  Nienke te Boveldt; Yvonne Engels; Kees Besse; Kris Vissers; Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 4.  Options for perioperative pain management in neurosurgery.

Authors:  Nalini Vadivelu; Alice M Kai; Daniel Tran; Gopal Kodumudi; Aron Legler; Eugenia Ayrian
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Evaluation of the pain intensity differences among hospitalized cancer patients based on a nursing information system.

Authors:  Wei-Yun Wang; Chi-Ming Chu; Yi-Syuan Wu; Chun-Sung Sung; Shung-Tai Ho; Hsueh-Hsing Pan; Kwua-Yun Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Trends in Clinically Significant Pain Prevalence Among Hospitalized Cancer Patients at an Academic Hospital in Taiwan: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wei-Yun Wang; Shung-Tai Ho; Shang-Liang Wu; Chi-Ming Chu; Chun-Sung Sung; Kwua-Yun Wang; Chun-Yu Liang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.