Literature DB >> 11113043

Randomized comparison of elective stent implantation and coronary balloon angioplasty guided by online quantitative angiography and intracoronary Doppler. DESTINI Study Group (Doppler Endpoint STenting INternational Investigation).

C Di Mario1, J W Moses, T J Anderson, R Bonan, T Muramatsu, A C Jain, J Suarez de Lezo, S Y Cho, M Kern, I T Meredith, D Cohen, I Moussa, A Colombo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term outcomes of coronary stenting in all lesions (elective stenting) or only in lesions with inadequate morphological and functional results after balloon angioplasty (guided PTCA). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Treatment of multivessel disease, with any lesion length and vessel size, was allowed provided that all lesions were suitable for stent implantation. Patients were randomized to elective stent implantation (n=370) or guided PTCA (n=365). An optimal PTCA result (residual diameter stenosis </=35%, coronary flow reserve measured with a Doppler guidewire >2.0, absence of threatening dissections) was achieved in 166 lesions (43%). The remaining 218 lesions underwent stent implantation (provisional stenting). Final residual diameter stenosis was lower in the elective and provisional stent groups (9.3% and 10.2%) than in the optimal PTCA group (24.8%, P:<0. 00001). On an intention-to-treat analysis, the probability of >/=1 major adverse cardiac event at 12 months was 17.8% in the elective stenting group and 18.9% in the guided PTCA group (20.1% for optimal PTCA and 18.0% for the provisional stenting subgroup, P:=NS). The incidence of repeat target lesion revascularization at 1 year was 14. 9% in the elective stent group and 15.6% in the guided PTCA group (17.6% for optimal PTCA and 14.1% for the provisional stenting subgroup, P:=NS).
CONCLUSIONS: When balloon angioplasty is guided by online quantitative angiography and Doppler-derived coronary flow reserve, with provisional stenting reserved for suboptimal results, early and late clinical outcomes are comparable to those achieved by elective stenting of all patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11113043     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.24.2938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  6 in total

1.  Coronary flow: clinical considerations.

Authors:  D V Cokkinos; A Manginas; V Voudris
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Are "treatment" bare metal stents superior to "control" bare metal stents? A meta-analytic approach.

Authors:  David M Kent; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Vasoconstriction seen in coronary bypass grafts during handgrip in humans.

Authors:  Afsana Momen; Amir Gahremanpour; Ather Mansoor; Allen Kunselman; Cheryl Blaha; Walter Pae; Urs A Leuenberger; Lawrence I Sinoway
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-10-26

4.  Coronary vasoconstrictor responses are attenuated in young women as compared with age-matched men.

Authors:  Afsana Momen; Zhaohui Gao; Abigail Cohen; Tamreen Khan; Urs A Leuenberger; Lawrence I Sinoway
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography to noninvasively assess coronary vasoconstrictor and dilator responses in humans.

Authors:  Afsana Momen; Mark Kozak; Urs A Leuenberger; Steven Ettinger; Cheryl Blaha; Vernon Mascarenhas; Vasili Lendel; Michael D Herr; Lawrence I Sinoway
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 6.  Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography - noninvasive diagnostic window for coronary flow reserve assessment.

Authors:  Paweł Petkow Dimitrow
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 2.062

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.