Literature DB >> 11111986

Organ survival after primary dysfunction of liver grafts in clinical orthotopic liver transplantation.

H Pokorny1, T Gruenberger, T Soliman, S Rockenschaub, F Längle, R Steininger.   

Abstract

In a retrospective analysis of 632 orthototopic liver transplant procedures performed between 1982 and 1997, the incidence of primary dysfunction (PDF) of the liver and its influence on organ survival were studied. Graft function during the first 3 postoperative days was categorized into four groups: (1) good (GOT max < 1000 U/l, spontaneous PT > 50%, bile production > 100 ml/day); (2) fair (GOT 1000-2500 U/l, clotting factor support < 2 days, bile < 100 ml/day); (3) poor (GOT > 2500 U/l, clotting factor support > 2 days, bile < 20 ml/day); (4) primary non-function (PNF; retransplantation required within 7 days). The aim of this study was to evaluate graft survival comparing organs with PDF (poor function) and PNF vs organs with initial good or fair function. After a median follow-up of 45 months, initially good and fair function of liver grafts resulted in a significantly better long-term graft survival compared with grafts with initially poor function or primary non-function (if re-transplanted) (P < 0.01). The Cox model revealed primary function as a highly significant factor in the prediction of long-term graft survival (P < 0.0001). We conclude that these results confirm the hypothesis that primary graft function is of major importance for the long-term survival of liver transplants. Patients with a poor primary function have the worst survival prognosis, which leads to the interpretation that these patients may be candidates for early retransplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11111986     DOI: 10.1007/s001470050310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  11 in total

Review 1.  Liver transplantation in the UK.

Authors:  S R Bramhall; E Minford; B Gunson; J A Buckels
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Quality of life, risk assessment, and safety research in liver transplantation: new frontiers in health services and outcomes research.

Authors:  Zeeshan Butt; Neehar D Parikh; Anton I Skaro; Daniela Ladner; David Cella
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.640

3.  Application of the BAR score as a predictor of short- and long-term survival in liver transplantation patients.

Authors:  Ivan Dias de Campos Junior; Raquel Silveira Bello Stucchi; Elisabete Yoko Udo; Ilka de Fátima Santana Ferreira Boin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  Developing a new nomogram to predict early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation: a nudge in the right direction.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Chen-Hao Jiang; Tao Lv; Jiu-Lin Song; Yong-Jie Zhou; Jian Yang; Li Jiang; Lyu-Nan Yan; Kui Luo; Jia-Yin Yang
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 8.265

Review 5.  Pig liver xenotransplantation as a bridge to allotransplantation: which patients might benefit?

Authors:  Burcin Ekser; Bruno Gridelli; A Joseph Tector; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  HTK-N, a modified HTK solution, decreases preservation injury in a model of microsteatotic rat liver transplantation.

Authors:  Qinlong Liu; Helge Bruns; Daniel Schultze; Yi Xue; Markus Zorn; Christa Flechtenmacher; Beate K Straub; Ursula Rauen; Peter Schemmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  The PRAISE study: a prospective, multi-center, randomized, double blinded, placebo-controlled study for the evaluation of iloprost in the early postoperative period after liver transplantation (ISRCTN12622749).

Authors:  Erik Bärthel; Falk Rauchfuss; Heike Hoyer; Maria Breternitz; Karin Jandt; Utz Settmacher
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Correlation of Histopathologic Findings of Non-Graft Threatening Preservation/Reperfusion Injury in Time-Zero Liver Needle Biopsies With Short-Term Post-transplantation Laboratory Alterations.

Authors:  Narges Shahbazi; Hayedeh Haeri; Mohsen Nasiri Toosi; Ali Jafarian; Reza Shahsiah; Monavar Talebian Moghadam; Sedigheh S Poursaleh; Farid Azmoudeh-Ardalan
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 0.660

Review 9.  Complement Activation in Liver Transplantation: Role of Donor Macrosteatosis and Implications in Delayed Graft Function.

Authors:  Kelley Núñez; Paul Thevenot; Abeer Alfadhli; Ari Cohen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Association of Graft Effluent Parameters with Donor Body Mass Index, Graft Quality, and Post-Transplant Events.

Authors:  Hani Oweira; Imad Lahdou; Volker Daniel; Jan Schmidt; Arianeb Mehrabi; Mahmoud Sadeghi
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.