Literature DB >> 11111333

The 1999 Fresno particulate matter exposure studies: comparison of community, outdoor, and residential PM mass measurements.

G F Evans1, R V Highsmith, L S Sheldon, J C Suggs, R W Williams, R B Zweidinger, J P Creason, D Walsh, C E Rodes, P A Lawless.   

Abstract

Two collaborative studies have been conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL) and National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory to determine personal exposures and physiological responses to particulate matter (PM) of elderly persons living in a retirement facility in Fresno, CA. Measurements of PM and other criteria air pollutants were made inside selected individual residences within the retirement facility and at a central outdoor site on the premises. In addition, personal PM exposure monitoring was conducted for a subset of the participants, and ambient PM monitoring data were available for comparison from the NERL PM research monitoring platform in central Fresno. Both a winter (February 1-28, 1999) and a spring (April 19-May 16, 1999) study were completed so that seasonal effects could be evaluated. During the spring study, a more robust personal exposure component was added, as well as a more detailed evaluation of physical factors, such as air-exchange rate, that are known to influence the penetration of particles into the indoor environment. In this paper, comparisons are made among measured personal PM exposures and PM mass concentrations measured at the NERL Fresno Platform site, outside on the premises of the retirement facility, and inside selected residential apartments at the facility during the two 28-day study periods. The arithmetic daily mean personal PM2.5 exposure during the winter study period was 13.3 micrograms/m3, compared with 9.7, 20.5, and 21.7 micrograms/m3 for daily mean overall apartment, outdoor, and ambient (i.e., platform) concentrations, respectively. The daily mean personal PM2.5 exposure during the spring study period was 11.1 micrograms/m3, compared with 8.0, 10.1, and 8.6 micrograms/m3 for the daily mean apartment, outdoor, and ambient concentrations, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11111333     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  5 in total

1.  Impact of personal and ambient-level exposures to nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter on cardiovascular function.

Authors:  Ron Williams; Robert Brook; Robert Bard; Teri Conner; Hwashin Shin; Richard Burnett
Journal:  Int J Environ Health Res       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Estimating error in using ambient PM2.5 concentrations as proxies for personal exposures: a review.

Authors:  Christy L Avery; Katherine T Mills; Ronald Williams; Kathleen A McGraw; Charles Poole; Richard L Smith; Eric A Whitsel
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Study of personal-indoor-ambient fine particulate matters among school communities in mixed urban-industrial environment in India.

Authors:  Neelima M Gadkari
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Estimating personal exposures from ambient air pollution measures: using meta-analysis to assess measurement error.

Authors:  Katelyn M Holliday; Christy L Avery; Charles Poole; Kathleen McGraw; Ronald Williams; Duanping Liao; Richard L Smith; Eric A Whitsel
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Exposure assessment of particulate matter for susceptible populations in Seattle.

Authors:  L-J Sally Liu; Michael Box; David Kalman; Joel Kaufman; Jane Koenig; Tim Larson; Thomas Lumley; Lianne Sheppard; Lance Wallace
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.