Literature DB >> 11110830

Comparison of odor receptive field plasticity in the rat olfactory bulb and anterior piriform cortex.

D A Wilson1.   

Abstract

Recent work in the anterior piriform cortex (aPCX) has demonstrated that cortical odor receptive fields are highly dynamic, showing rapid changes of both firing rate and temporal patterning within relatively few inhalations of an odor, despite relatively maintained, patterned input from olfactory bulb mitral/tufted cells. The present experiment examined the precision (odor-specificity) of this receptive field plasticity and compared it with the primary cortical afferent, olfactory bulb mitral/tufted cells. Adult Long-Evans hooded rats, urethan anesthetized and freely breathing, were used for single-unit recording from mitral/tufted and aPCX layer II/III neurons. Partial mapping of receptive fields to alkane odors (pentane, heptane, and nonane) was performed before and immediately after habituation (50-s exposure) to one of the alkanes. The results demonstrated that odor habituation of aPCX responses was odor specific, with minimal cross-habituation between alkanes differing by as few as two carbons. Mitral/tufted cells, however, showed strong cross-habituation within the odor set with the most profound cross effects to carbon chains shorter than the habituating stimulus. The results suggest that although mitral/tufted cells and aPCX neurons have roughly similar odor receptive fields, aPCX neurons have significantly better odor discrimination within their receptive field. The results have important implications for understanding the underlying bases of receptive fields in olfactory system neurons and the mechanisms of odor discrimination and memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11110830     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.6.3036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  Experience modifies olfactory acuity: acetylcholine-dependent learning decreases behavioral generalization between similar odorants.

Authors:  Max L Fletcher; Donald A Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Olfactory fear conditioning induces field potential potentiation in rat olfactory cortex and amygdala.

Authors:  Yannick Sevelinges; Rémi Gervais; Belkacem Messaoudi; Lionel Granjon; Anne-Marie Mouly
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 3.  Plasticity in the olfactory system: lessons for the neurobiology of memory.

Authors:  D A Wilson; A R Best; R M Sullivan
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.519

4.  Cortical metabotropic glutamate receptors contribute to habituation of a simple odor-evoked behavior.

Authors:  Aaron R Best; Jason V Thompson; Max L Fletcher; Donald A Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Contrasting short-term plasticity at two sides of the mitral-granule reciprocal synapse in the mammalian olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Shelby B Dietz; Venkatesh N Murthy
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Associative encoding in posterior piriform cortex during odor discrimination and reversal learning.

Authors:  Donna J Calu; Matthew R Roesch; Thomas A Stalnaker; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Learning to smell the roses: experience-dependent neural plasticity in human piriform and orbitofrontal cortices.

Authors:  Wen Li; Erin Luxenberg; Todd Parrish; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Associative encoding in anterior piriform cortex versus orbitofrontal cortex during odor discrimination and reversal learning.

Authors:  Matthew R Roesch; Thomas A Stalnaker; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Distinct neural mechanisms mediate olfactory memory formation at different timescales.

Authors:  Ann Marie McNamara; Phillip D Magidson; Christiane Linster; Donald A Wilson; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Ontogeny of odor-LiCl vs. odor-shock learning: similar behaviors but divergent ages of functional amygdala emergence.

Authors:  Charlis Raineki; Kiseko Shionoya; Kristin Sander; Regina M Sullivan
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.