Literature DB >> 11110785

The ligands of CXC chemokine receptor 3, I-TAC, Mig, and IP10, are natural antagonists for CCR3.

P Loetscher1, A Pellegrino, J H Gong, I Mattioli, M Loetscher, G Bardi, M Baggiolini, I Clark-Lewis.   

Abstract

Th1 and Th2 lymphocytes express a different repertoire of chemokine receptors (CCRs). CXCR3, the receptor for I-TAC (interferon-inducible T cell alpha-chemoattractant), Mig (monokine induced by gamma-interferon), and IP10 (interferon-inducible protein 10), is expressed preferentially on Th1 cells, whereas CCR3, the receptor for eotaxin and several other CC chemokines, is characteristic of Th2 cells. While studying responses that are mediated by these two receptors, we found that the agonists for CXCR3 act as antagonists for CCR3. I-TAC, Mig, and IP10 compete for the binding of eotaxin to CCR3-bearing cells and inhibit migration and Ca(2+) changes induced in such cells by stimulation with eotaxin, eotaxin-2, MCP-2 (monocyte chemottractant protein-2), MCP-3, MCP-4, and RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted). A hybrid chemokine generated by substituting the first eight NH(2)-terminal residues of eotaxin with those of I-TAC bound CCR3 with higher affinity than eotaxin or I-TAC (3- and 10-fold, respectively). The hybrid was 5-fold more potent than I-TAC as an inhibitor of eotaxin activity and was effective at concentrations as low as 5 nm. None of the antagonists described induced the internalization of CCR3, indicating that they lack agonistic effects and thus qualify as pure antagonists. These results suggest that chemokines that attract Th1 cells via CXCR3 can concomitantly block the migration of Th2 cells in response to CCR3 ligands, thus enhancing the polarization of T cell recruitment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11110785     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M005652200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  84 in total

Review 1.  Understanding selective trafficking of lymphocyte subsets.

Authors:  M Heydtmann; D H Adams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Probing the role of CXC motif in chemokine CXCL8 for high affinity binding and activation of CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors.

Authors:  Prem Raj B Joseph; Jose M Sarmiento; Anurag K Mishra; Sandhya T Das; Roberto P Garofalo; Javier Navarro; Krishna Rajarathnam
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Helicobacter pylori-specific CD4+ T cells home to and accumulate in the human Helicobacter pylori-infected gastric mucosa.

Authors:  Anna Lundgren; Christina Trollmo; Anders Edebo; Ann-Mari Svennerholm; B Samuel Lundin
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 4.  The attraction of chemokines as a target for specific anti-inflammatory therapy.

Authors:  James E Pease; Timothy J Williams
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  The chemokine network. I. How the genomic organization of chemokines contains clues for deciphering their functional complexity.

Authors:  R Colobran; R Pujol-Borrell; M P Armengol; M Juan
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  Inflammatory and immune pathways in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease.

Authors:  Ali Cekici; Alpdogan Kantarci; Hatice Hasturk; Thomas E Van Dyke
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.589

Review 7.  Chemokines and their receptors in the allergic airway inflammatory process.

Authors:  Juan Raymundo Velazquez; Luis Manuel Teran
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 8.667

8.  Targeting chemokine pathways in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Makardhwaj S Shrivastava; Zulfiqar Hussain; Orsolya Giricz; Niraj Shenoy; Rahul Polineni; Anirban Maitra; Amit Verma
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Aberrant inflammatory response to Streptococcus pyogenes in mice lacking myeloid differentiation factor 88.

Authors:  Torsten G Loof; Oliver Goldmann; André Gessner; Heiko Herwald; Eva Medina
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Increased serum levels of interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10 and monokine induced by gamma interferon in patients with haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis.

Authors:  H Takada; Y Takahata; A Nomura; S Ohga; Y Mizuno; T Hara
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.