T Stokol1, M B Brooks, H N Erb. 1. Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of citrate concentration (3.2 vs 3.8%) on coagulation tests in dogs. DESIGN: Original study. ANIMALS: 30 clinically healthy dogs and 12 dogs with hereditary hemostatic disorders. PROCEDURE: Blood was collected from all dogs directly into collection tubes containing 3.2 or 3.8% buffered citrate. Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and fibrinogen concentration were measured by use of 3 clot-detection assay systems (2 mechanical and 1 photo-optic). Factor VIII and factor IX coagulant activities (FVIII:C and FIX:C, respectively) were determined by use of a manual tilt-tube method and a mechanical clot-detection device. RESULTS: Significant differences were not detected in median PT, fibrinogen concentration, FVIII:C, or FIX:C between 3.2 and 3.8% citrate for any assay system. A significant prolongation in aPTT for 3.2% citrate, compared with 3.8% citrate, was found in 1 mechanical system. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Citrate concentration does not significantly affect results of most coagulation assays, regardless of assay system. The aPTT was mildly influenced by the citrate concentration, although this was animal-, instrument-, and reagent-dependent. The choice of 3.2 or 3.8% citrate as an anticoagulant for coagulation tests has minimal influence on assay results in healthy dogs or dogs with hereditary hemostatic disorders.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of citrate concentration (3.2 vs 3.8%) on coagulation tests in dogs. DESIGN: Original study. ANIMALS: 30 clinically healthy dogs and 12 dogs with hereditary hemostatic disorders. PROCEDURE: Blood was collected from all dogs directly into collection tubes containing 3.2 or 3.8% buffered citrate. Prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and fibrinogen concentration were measured by use of 3 clot-detection assay systems (2 mechanical and 1 photo-optic). Factor VIII and factor IX coagulant activities (FVIII:C and FIX:C, respectively) were determined by use of a manual tilt-tube method and a mechanical clot-detection device. RESULTS: Significant differences were not detected in median PT, fibrinogen concentration, FVIII:C, or FIX:C between 3.2 and 3.8% citrate for any assay system. A significant prolongation in aPTT for 3.2% citrate, compared with 3.8% citrate, was found in 1 mechanical system. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Citrate concentration does not significantly affect results of most coagulation assays, regardless of assay system. The aPTT was mildly influenced by the citrate concentration, although this was animal-, instrument-, and reagent-dependent. The choice of 3.2 or 3.8% citrate as an anticoagulant for coagulation tests has minimal influence on assay results in healthy dogs or dogs with hereditary hemostatic disorders.
Authors: Henrike Kuder; S Kent Dickeson; Marjory B Brooks; Alexandra Kehl; Elisabeth Müller; David Gailani; Urs Giger Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 4.141
Authors: Dana N LeVine; Adam J Birkenheuer; Marjory B Brooks; Shila K Nordone; Dwight A Bellinger; Sam L Jones; Thomas H Fischer; Stephen E Oglesbee; Kahlina Frey; Nicole S Brinson; Allison P Peters; Henry S Marr; Alison Motsinger-Reif; Sif Gudbrandsdottir; James B Bussel; Nigel S Key Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 6.998