INTRODUCTION: The management of orbital floor fractures continues to be debated. Bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics are in the new group of materials developed for the repair of bone defects which are beyond any innate healing capacity due to their size. OBJECTIVE: We compared the use of alloplastic implants (bioactive glass) with conventional autogenous grafts (cartilage--plus or minus Iyophilized dura) for the repair of orbital floor defects after trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients having orbital floor fractures with persistent diplopia, enophthalmos, and/or infraorbital nerve paraesthesia were operated on from 1991 to 1995 at Turku University Central Hospital. Reconstruction was either with bioactive glass (S93P4) or autogenous cartilage implants. RESULTS: Postoperative tomograms in the 28 patients showed adequate maintenance of orbital and maxillary sinus volume without any evidence of resorption in either group. None of 14 patients in the study group had any evidence of dystopia or complications relating to implants follow-up. One had infraorbital nerve paraesthesia and another had entropion postoperatively. Among the 14 control subjects there were three cases of persistent diplopia, two of infraorbital nerve paraesthesia and one of enophthalmos. CONCLUSION: Bioactive glass implants are well-tolerated and seem to be a promising repair material for orbital floor fractures. Their use leads to less morbidity as no donor site operation is needed. Also it provides favourable healing as it is bioactive, biocompatible and causes new bone formation.
INTRODUCTION: The management of orbital floor fractures continues to be debated. Bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics are in the new group of materials developed for the repair of bone defects which are beyond any innate healing capacity due to their size. OBJECTIVE: We compared the use of alloplastic implants (bioactive glass) with conventional autogenous grafts (cartilage--plus or minus Iyophilized dura) for the repair of orbital floor defects after trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-eight patients having orbital floor fractures with persistent diplopia, enophthalmos, and/or infraorbital nerve paraesthesia were operated on from 1991 to 1995 at Turku University Central Hospital. Reconstruction was either with bioactive glass (S93P4) or autogenous cartilage implants. RESULTS: Postoperative tomograms in the 28 patients showed adequate maintenance of orbital and maxillary sinus volume without any evidence of resorption in either group. None of 14 patients in the study group had any evidence of dystopia or complications relating to implants follow-up. One had infraorbital nerve paraesthesia and another had entropion postoperatively. Among the 14 control subjects there were three cases of persistent diplopia, two of infraorbital nerve paraesthesia and one of enophthalmos. CONCLUSION: Bioactive glass implants are well-tolerated and seem to be a promising repair material for orbital floor fractures. Their use leads to less morbidity as no donor site operation is needed. Also it provides favourable healing as it is bioactive, biocompatible and causes new bone formation.
Authors: Martin Gosau; Moritz Schöneich; Florian G Draenert; Tobias Ettl; Oliver Driemel; Torsten E Reichert Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 3.573