Literature DB >> 11110125

On the computational power of winner-take-all.

W Maass1.   

Abstract

This article initiates a rigorous theoretical analysis of the computational power of circuits that employ modules for computing winner-take-all. Computational models that involve competitive stages have so far been neglected in computational complexity theory, although they are widely used in computational brain models, artificial neural networks, and analog VLSI. Our theoretical analysis shows that winner-take-all is a surprisingly powerful computational module in comparison with threshold gates (also referred to as McCulloch-Pitts neurons) and sigmoidal gates. We prove an optimal quadratic lower bound for computing winner-take-all in any feedforward circuit consisting of threshold gates. In addition we show that arbitrary continuous functions can be approximated by circuits employing a single soft winner-take-all gate as their only nonlinear operation. Our theoretical analysis also provides answers to two basic questions raised by neurophysiologists in view of the well-known asymmetry between excitatory and inhibitory connections in cortical circuits: how much computational power of neural networks is lost if only positive weights are employed in weighted sums and how much adaptive capability is lost if only the positive weights are subject to plasticity.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11110125     DOI: 10.1162/089976600300014827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  43 in total

1.  Scaling down DNA circuits with competitive neural networks.

Authors:  Anthony J Genot; Teruo Fujii; Yannick Rondelez
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Multi-stage methodology to detect health insurance claim fraud.

Authors:  Marina Evrim Johnson; Nagen Nagarur
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2015-01-20

3.  Network structure and input integration in competing firing rate models for decision-making.

Authors:  Victor J Barranca; Han Huang; Genji Kawakita
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Emergence of Binocular Disparity Selectivity through Hebbian Learning.

Authors:  Tushar Chauhan; Timothée Masquelier; Alexandre Montlibert; Benoit R Cottereau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Feedback Inhibition Shapes Emergent Computational Properties of Cortical Microcircuit Motifs.

Authors:  Zeno Jonke; Robert Legenstein; Stefan Habenschuss; Wolfgang Maass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Overrepresentation of extreme events in decision making reflects rational use of cognitive resources.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths; Ming Hsu
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Schaffer Collateral Inputs to CA1 Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons Follow Different Connectivity Rules.

Authors:  Osung Kwon; Linqing Feng; Shaul Druckmann; Jinhyun Kim
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Transcranial Electrical Stimulation: What We Know and Do Not Know About Mechanisms.

Authors:  Anna Fertonani; Carlo Miniussi
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 7.519

9.  Convergence and rate analysis of neural networks for sparse approximation.

Authors:  Aurèle Balavoine; Justin Romberg; Christopher J Rozell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 10.451

10.  A principle of economy predicts the functional architecture of grid cells.

Authors:  Xue-Xin Wei; Jason Prentice; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.