Literature DB >> 11109547

Generation of transgenic rats with YACs and BACs: preparation procedures and integrity of microinjected DNA.

R Takahashi1, K Ito, Y Fujiwara, K Kodaira, K Kodaira, M Hirabayashi, M Ueda.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate differences in the methods for preparing a large DNA fragment to be used for making transgenic rats from the standpoint of transgenic production efficiency and integrity of the introduced gene. In yeast artificial chromosome (YAC) transgenesis, three methods for preparing DNA for microinjection were compared: amplification of YAC in yeast (AMP), amplification of YAC in yeast and removal of the amplification element (AMP/RE), and no amplification of the YAC in yeast (AMP-). Production efficiency per microinjected ovum with DNA by the AMP method was four times higher than that by the AMP/RE and AMP-. Based on these results, we favor the AMP method in spite of the thymidine kinase gene-induced male sterility. In bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenesis, linear DNA fragments for microinjection prepared by three kinds of purification procedures were compared: Not I digestion and CsCl gradient ultra-centrifugation (Prep. 1), CsCl gradient ultra-centrifugation, Not I digestion, gel electrophoresis, and beta-agarase digestion (Prep. 2), and CsCl gradient ultra-centrifugation, Not I digestion, pulse field gel electrophoresis, and beta-agarase digestion (Prep. 3). Although the efficiency of producing transgenic rats was similar with all these three DNA preparations, integration of the intact DNA fragment only occurred with the Prep. 3 procedure. We therefore favor the Prep. 3 method for preparing BAC DNA fragments. These results indicate that the method used to prepare a large DNA fragment such as YAC and BAC DNAs is important in order to produce transgenic rats with an intact transgene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11109547     DOI: 10.1538/expanim.49.229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Anim        ISSN: 0007-5124


  7 in total

1.  BAC resources for the rat genome project.

Authors:  Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Baoli Zhu; Chung Li Shu; Teresa Ren; Qing Cao; Gery M Vessere; Michelle M Lutz; Michael I Jensen-Seaman; Shaying Zhao; Pieter J de Jong
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Zinc-finger nucleases: new strategies to target the rat genome.

Authors:  Aron M Geurts; Carol Moreno
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 6.124

Review 3.  Transgenic modifications of the rat genome.

Authors:  Laurent Tesson; Jean Cozzi; Séverine Ménoret; Séverine Rémy; Claire Usal; Alexandre Fraichard; Ignacio Anegon
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Direct introduction of gene constructs into the pronucleus-like structure of cloned embryos: a new strategy for the generation of genetically modified pigs.

Authors:  Mayuko Kurome; Simon Leuchs; Barbara Kessler; Elisabeth Kemter; Eva-Maria Jemiller; Beatrix Foerster; Nikolai Klymiuk; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Eckhard Wolf
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  Beyond the rat models of human neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Ondrej Bugos; Mangesh Bhide; Norbert Zilka
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 5.046

6.  Variations in promoter activity reveal a differential expression and physiology of glutamate transporters by glia in the developing and mature CNS.

Authors:  Melissa R Regan; Yanhua H Huang; Yu Shin Kim; Margaret I Dykes-Hoberg; Lin Jin; Andrew M Watkins; Dwight E Bergles; Jeffrey D Rothstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  ssODN-mediated knock-in with CRISPR-Cas for large genomic regions in zygotes.

Authors:  Kazuto Yoshimi; Yayoi Kunihiro; Takehito Kaneko; Hitoshi Nagahora; Birger Voigt; Tomoji Mashimo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.