Literature DB >> 11108605

The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the house finch. I. Population divergence in morphological covariance structure.

A V Badyaev1, G E Hill.   

Abstract

Patterns of genetic variation and covariation strongly affect the rate and direction of evolutionary change by limiting the amount and form of genetic variation available to natural selection. We studied evolution of morphological variance-covariance structure among seven populations of house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) with a known phylogenetic history. We examined the relationship between within- and among-population covariance structure and, in particular, tested the concordance between hierarchical changes in morphological variance-covariance structure and phylogenetic history of this species. We found that among-population morphological divergence in either males or females did not follow the within-population covariance patterns. Hierarchical patterns of similarity in morphological covariance matrices were not congruent with a priori defined historical pattern of population divergence. Both of these results point to the lack of proportionality in morphological covariance structure of finch populations, suggesting that random drift alone is unlikely to account for observed divergence. Furthermore, drift alone cannot explain the sex differences in within- and among-population covariance patterns or sex-specific patterns of evolution of covariance structure. Our results suggest that extensive among-population variation in sexual dimorphism in morphological covariance structure was produced by population differences in local selection pressures acting on each sex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11108605     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00722.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  20 in total

1.  Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P C Phillips; M C Whitlock; K Fowler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Comparing G matrices: are common principal components informative?

Authors:  Jason G Mezey; David Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3D facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Peter Claes; Mark Walters; Mark D Shriver; David Puts; Greg Gibson; John Clement; Gareth Baynam; Geert Verbeke; Dirk Vandermeulen; Paul Suetens
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Contemporary morphological diversification of passerine birds introduced to the Hawaiian archipelago.

Authors:  Blake A Mathys; Julie L Lockwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Independent axes of genetic variation and parallel evolutionary divergence of opercle bone shape in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Charles B Kimmel; William A Cresko; Patrick C Phillips; Bonnie Ullmann; Mark Currey; Frank von Hippel; Bjarni K Kristjánsson; Ofer Gelmond; Katrina McGuigan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Evolutionary significance of phenotypic accommodation in novel environments: an empirical test of the Baldwin effect.

Authors:  Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Size correction in biology: how reliable are approaches based on (common) principal component analysis?

Authors:  Daniel Berner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Prevalence of blood parasites in eastern versus Western house finches: are eastern birds resistant to infection?

Authors:  Andrew K Davis; Wendy R Hood; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.184

9.  Limited plasticity in the phenotypic variance-covariance matrix for male advertisement calls in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus.

Authors:  W R Pitchers; R Brooks; M D Jennions; T Tregenza; I Dworkin; J Hunt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Interaction between maternal effects: onset of incubation and offspring sex in two populations of a passerine bird.

Authors:  Alexander V Badyaev; Geoffrey E Hill; Michelle L Beck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.