PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in the treatment of chronic urinary retention (CUR) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 29 patients with CUR due to BPH underwent high-energy TUMT. Prior to treatment and during a 12-week follow-up, the following parameters were determined: quality of life (QOL) score, peak flow rate (Qmax) by uroflowmetry, and postvoid residual urine (PVR). In those with treatment failure (PVR > 150 mL or urinary retention), pressure-flow studies were performed and compared to pre-TUMT urodynamics. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients, 21 (72%) regained the ability to void spontaneously at 5 weeks. The actuarial median time for spontaneous voiding to be restored was 3.5 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-4.8 weeks). Mean QOL score at 12 weeks post-TUMT (2.2; 95% CI 1.5-2.7) was lower than that at 1 week (4.6; 95% CI 3.9-5.8) by 51% (p < 0.0005). Further, a 55% increase in mean Qmax (p < .0005) determined by uroflowmetry was observed by 12 weeks vs. 1 week after high-energy TUMT. TUMT failed in 8 patients due to a hypocontractile detrusor. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that high-energy TUMT is a potentially useful option for patient with CUR who are not candidates for prostatectomy.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) in the treatment of chronic urinary retention (CUR) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 29 patients with CUR due to BPH underwent high-energy TUMT. Prior to treatment and during a 12-week follow-up, the following parameters were determined: quality of life (QOL) score, peak flow rate (Qmax) by uroflowmetry, and postvoid residual urine (PVR). In those with treatment failure (PVR > 150 mL or urinary retention), pressure-flow studies were performed and compared to pre-TUMT urodynamics. RESULTS: Of the 29 patients, 21 (72%) regained the ability to void spontaneously at 5 weeks. The actuarial median time for spontaneous voiding to be restored was 3.5 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-4.8 weeks). Mean QOL score at 12 weeks post-TUMT (2.2; 95% CI 1.5-2.7) was lower than that at 1 week (4.6; 95% CI 3.9-5.8) by 51% (p < 0.0005). Further, a 55% increase in mean Qmax (p < .0005) determined by uroflowmetry was observed by 12 weeks vs. 1 week after high-energy TUMT. TUMT failed in 8 patients due to a hypocontractile detrusor. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that high-energy TUMT is a potentially useful option for patient with CUR who are not candidates for prostatectomy.