Literature DB >> 11108299

Increased stem cell dose, as obtained using currently available technology, may not be sufficient for engraftment of haploidentical stem cell transplants.

J R Passweg1, T Kühne, M Gregor, G Favre, P Avoledo, A Tichelli, A Gratwohl.   

Abstract

The best strategies for haploidentical stem cell transplants are not known. We used a standard myeloablative pretransplant conditioning regimen (30 mg/kg VP-16, 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide, and 12 Gy of TBI in six fractions), an increased peripheral stem cell dose of > 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, T cell depletion (with CD34+ cell selection and CD4/CD8 depletion steps) to < 1 x 10(5) CD3+ cells/kg and cyclosporine post transplant. Ten patients (7M/3F, median age 11 (3-33) years) with high-risk leukemia (AML in 4, MDS in 2, CML in 1 and T-ALL in 3) received a hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from a haploidentical father or sibling. The median number of CD34+ cells was 12.9 (9.5-45.7) x 10(6) cells/kg; median number of CD3+ cells was 0.41 (0.09-1.89) x 10(5) CD3+ cells/kg. All patients initially achieved 0.5 x 10(9)/l neutrophils at a median 12 (10-21) days. Graft failure in two consecutive patients out of four on the original protocol led to a modification adding ATG pretransplant and OKT3 post transplant. Graft failure was observed in one out of six subsequent patients. Acute GVHD > or = grade II was observed in three patients. Three of 10 patients are alive in CR at > 24 and >3 (2) months after transplant. Seven patients died: four of transplant related complications and three of relapse. Increased stem cell dose (> or = 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg) as obtained using currently available technology may not be sufficient to ensure stable engraftment in patients with high-risk leukemia using standard myeloablative conditioning regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11108299     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  5 in total

1.  Lack of antidonor alloantibody does not indicate lack of immune sensitization: studies of graft loss in a haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation swine model.

Authors:  Raimon Duran-Struuck; Abraham Matar; Rebecca Crepeau; Ashley Gusha; Marian Schenk; Isabel Hanekamp; Vimukthi Pathiraja; Thomas R Spitzer; David H Sachs; Christene A Huang
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Immunosuppressive properties of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Mohamed Abumaree; Mohammed Al Jumah; Rishika A Pace; Bill Kalionis
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 3.  Nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant using mismatched/haploidentical donors: a review.

Authors:  Liang-Piu Koh; Nelson J Chao
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Review of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Mehreen A Khan; Qaiser Bashir; Qamar-Un-Nisa Chaudhry; Parvez Ahmed; Tariq M Satti; Syed K Mahmood
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-12

Review 5.  From Cancer to Immune-Mediated Diseases and Tolerance Induction: Lessons Learned From Immune Oncology and Classical Anti-cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Stephan Klöß; Susann Dehmel; Armin Braun; Michael J Parnham; Ulrike Köhl; Susanne Schiffmann
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.