BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: In several nonrandomized studies investigators have reported on the value of postoperative carotid duplex surveillance (PCDS) with mixed results; however the type of closure was not analyzed in these studies. In this study we analyze the frequency and timing of postoperative carotid duplex ultrasound scanning according to the type of closure from a randomized carotid endarterectomy (CEA) trial comparing primary closure (PC) versus patching. PATIENT POPULATION AND METHODS: We randomized 399 CEAs into 135 PCs, 134 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch closures, and 130 vein patch closures (VPCs) with a mean follow-up of 47 months. PCDS was done at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter (a mean of 4.0 studies per artery). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the rate of > or = 80% restenosis over time and the time frame of progression from < 50%, to 50%-79% and > or = 80% stenosis. RESULTS: Restenoses of > or =80% developed in 24 (21%) arteries with PC and nine (4%) with patching. Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom of > or = 80% restenosis at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 92%, 83%, 80%, 76%, and 68% for PC, respectively, and 100%, 99%, 98%, 98%, and 91% for patching, respectively, (P <.01). Of 56 arteries with 20% to 50% restenosis, two of 28 patch closures and 10 of 28 PCs progressed to 50% to < 80% restenosis (P =.02); none of the patch closures and six of 28 PCs progressed to > or =80% (P =.03). In PCs, the median time to progression from <50% to 50%-79%, < 50% to > or =80%, and 50%-79% to > or = 80% was 42, 46, and 7 months, respectively. Of the 24 arteries with > or =80% restenosis in PC, 10 were symptomatic. Thus, assuming th symptomatic restenosis would have undergone duplex scan examinations regardless, there were 14 asymptomatic arteries (12%) that could have been detected only with PCDS (estimated cost, $139, 200), and those patients would have been candidates for redo CEA. Of the 9 arteries (3 PTFE closures and 6 VPCs) with > or =80% restenosis with patch closures, 6 asymptomatic (4 VPCs and 2 PTFE closures) arteries (3%) could have been detected with PCDS. In patients with normal duplex scan findings at the first 6 months, only four (2%) of 222 patched arteries (two asymptomatic) developed > or = 80% restenosis versus five (38%) of 13 in patients with abnormal duplex scan examination findings (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS:PCDS is beneficial in patients with PC, but is less beneficial in patients with patch closure. PCDS examinations at 6 months and at 1- to 2-year intervals for several years after PC are adequate. For patients with patching, a 6-month postoperative duplex scan examination with normal results is adequate.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: In several nonrandomized studies investigators have reported on the value of postoperative carotid duplex surveillance (PCDS) with mixed results; however the type of closure was not analyzed in these studies. In this study we analyze the frequency and timing of postoperative carotid duplex ultrasound scanning according to the type of closure from a randomized carotid endarterectomy (CEA) trial comparing primary closure (PC) versus patching. PATIENT POPULATION AND METHODS: We randomized 399 CEAs into 135 PCs, 134 polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch closures, and 130 vein patch closures (VPCs) with a mean follow-up of 47 months. PCDS was done at 1, 6, and 12 months and every year thereafter (a mean of 4.0 studies per artery). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the rate of > or = 80% restenosis over time and the time frame of progression from < 50%, to 50%-79% and > or = 80% stenosis. RESULTS: Restenoses of > or =80% developed in 24 (21%) arteries with PC and nine (4%) with patching. Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom of > or = 80% restenosis at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 92%, 83%, 80%, 76%, and 68% for PC, respectively, and 100%, 99%, 98%, 98%, and 91% for patching, respectively, (P <.01). Of 56 arteries with 20% to 50% restenosis, two of 28 patch closures and 10 of 28 PCs progressed to 50% to < 80% restenosis (P =.02); none of the patch closures and six of 28 PCs progressed to > or =80% (P =.03). In PCs, the median time to progression from <50% to 50%-79%, < 50% to > or =80%, and 50%-79% to > or = 80% was 42, 46, and 7 months, respectively. Of the 24 arteries with > or =80% restenosis in PC, 10 were symptomatic. Thus, assuming th symptomatic restenosis would have undergone duplex scan examinations regardless, there were 14 asymptomatic arteries (12%) that could have been detected only with PCDS (estimated cost, $139, 200), and those patients would have been candidates for redo CEA. Of the 9 arteries (3 PTFE closures and 6 VPCs) with > or =80% restenosis with patch closures, 6 asymptomatic (4 VPCs and 2 PTFE closures) arteries (3%) could have been detected with PCDS. In patients with normal duplex scan findings at the first 6 months, only four (2%) of 222 patched arteries (two asymptomatic) developed > or = 80% restenosis versus five (38%) of 13 in patients with abnormal duplex scan examination findings (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: PCDS is beneficial in patients with PC, but is less beneficial in patients with patch closure. PCDS examinations at 6 months and at 1- to 2-year intervals for several years after PC are adequate. For patients with patching, a 6-month postoperative duplex scan examination with normal results is adequate.
Authors: Ali F AbuRahma; Mohit Srivastava; Zachary AbuRahma; Will Jackson; Albeir Mousa; Patrick A Stone; L Scott Dean; Jason Green Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2015-05-09 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Martijn S Marsman; Jørn Wetterslev; Abdelkarime Kh Jahrome; Christian Gluud; Frans L Moll; Frederik Keus; Giel G Koning Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2021-05-06