Literature DB >> 11106684

Oxidative stress and AP-1 activity in tamoxifen-resistant breast tumors in vivo.

R Schiff1, P Reddy, M Ahotupa, E Coronado-Heinsohn, M Grim, S G Hilsenbeck, R Lawrence, S Deneke, R Herrera, G C Chamness, S A Fuqua, P H Brown, C K Osborne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most breast cancers, even those that are initially responsive to tamoxifen, ultimately become resistant. The molecular basis for this resistance, which in some patients is thought to involve stimulation of tumor growth by tamoxifen, is unclear. Tamoxifen induces cellular oxidative stress, and because changes in cell redox state can activate signaling pathways leading to the activation of activating protein-1 (AP-1), we investigated whether tamoxifen-resistant growth in vivo is associated with oxidative stress and/or activation of AP-1 in a xenograft model system where resistance is caused by tamoxifen-stimulated growth.
METHODS: Control estrogen-treated, tamoxifen-sensitive, and tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 xenograft tumors were assessed for oxidative stress by measuring levels of antioxidant enzyme (e.g., superoxide dismutase [SOD], glutathione S-transferase [GST], and hexose monophosphate shunt [HMS]) activity, glutathione, and lipid peroxidation. AP-1 protein levels, phosphorylated c-jun levels, and phosphorylated Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase (JNK) levels were examined by western blot analyses, and AP-1 DNA-binding and transcriptional activities were assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assays and a reporter gene system. All statistical tests are two-sided.
RESULTS: Compared with control estrogen-treated tumors, tamoxifen resistant tumors had statistically significantly increased SOD (more than threefold; P=.004) and GST (twofold; P=.004) activity and statistically significantly reduced glutathione levels (greater than twofold; P<.001) and HMS activity (10-fold; P<.001). Lipid peroxides were not significantly different between control and tamoxifen-resistant tumors. We observed no differences in AP-1 protein components or DNA-binding activity. However, AP-1-dependent transcription (P=.04) and phosphorylated c-Jun and JNK levels (P<.001) were statistically significantly increased in the tamoxifen-resistant tumors.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the conversion of breast tumors to a tamoxifen-resistant phenotype is associated with oxidative stress and the subsequent antioxidant response and with increased phosphorylated JNK and c-Jun levels and AP-1 activity, which together could contribute to tumor growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11106684     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.23.1926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  60 in total

Review 1.  The changing role of ER in endocrine resistance.

Authors:  Agostina Nardone; Carmine De Angelis; Meghana V Trivedi; C Kent Osborne; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Allele-specific methylation of a functional CTCF binding site upstream of MEG3 in the human imprinted domain of 14q32.

Authors:  Alberto L Rosa; Yuan-Qing Wu; Bernard Kwabi-Addo; Karen J Coveler; V Reid Sutton; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Musgrove; Robert L Sutherland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Critical roles for nitric oxide and ERK in the completion of prosurvival autophagy in 4OHTAM-treated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Lei Duan; Brian Danzer; Victor V Levenson; Carl G Maki
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  HOXB7 Is an ERα Cofactor in the Activation of HER2 and Multiple ER Target Genes Leading to Endocrine Resistance.

Authors:  Kideok Jin; Sunju Park; Wei Wen Teo; Preethi Korangath; Sean Soonweng Cho; Takahiro Yoshida; Balázs Győrffy; Chirayu Pankaj Goswami; Harikrishna Nakshatri; Leigh-Ann Cruz; Weiqiang Zhou; Hongkai Ji; Ying Su; Muhammad Ekram; Zhengsheng Wu; Tao Zhu; Kornelia Polyak; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 6.  Biology and therapeutic potential of PI3K signaling in ER+/HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoyong Fu; C Kent Osborne; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Enhancer reprogramming driven by high-order assemblies of transcription factors promotes phenotypic plasticity and breast cancer endocrine resistance.

Authors:  Mingjun Bi; Zhao Zhang; Yi-Zhou Jiang; Pengya Xue; Hu Wang; Zhao Lai; Xiaoyong Fu; Carmine De Angelis; Yue Gong; Zhen Gao; Jianhua Ruan; Victor X Jin; Elisabetta Marangoni; Elodie Montaudon; Christopher K Glass; Wei Li; Tim Hui-Ming Huang; Zhi-Ming Shao; Rachel Schiff; Lizhen Chen; Zhijie Liu
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Elevated protein kinase C alpha expression may be predictive of tamoxifen treatment failure.

Authors:  D A Tonetti; M Morrow; N Kidwai; A Gupta; S Badve
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-05-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Key signalling nodes in mammary gland development and cancer. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling in experimental models of breast cancer progression and in mammary gland development.

Authors:  Jacqueline Whyte; Orla Bergin; Alessandro Bianchi; Sara McNally; Finian Martin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  A gene signature of loss of oestrogen receptor (ER) function and oxidative stress links ER-positive breast tumours with an absent progesterone receptor and a poor prognosis.

Authors:  Patrick Neven; Toon Van Gorp; Karen Deraedt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.