Literature DB >> 11106116

2-Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D glucose positron emission tomography in the pretreatment staging of Hodgkin's disease: influence on patient management in a single institution.

S Partridge1, A Timothy, M J O'Doherty, S F Hain, S Rankin, G Mikhaeel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Optimum therapy for patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) is determined by a number of prognostic factors, one of which is an accurate definition of extent of disease (stage). Computerised tomography is widely used in staging but cannot reliably evaluate normal sized lymph nodes and some extranodal sites, e.g., liver, spleen and bone marrow. 2-Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D glucose (FDG) has been shown to concentrate preferentially in lymphoma sites (whether in nodal or extranodal tissue) and therefore may have a useful role in staging patients with HD. This study compares concurrent computerized tomography (CT) and FDG positron emission tomography (PET) in the staging of Hodgkin's disease and assesses the frequency of stage migration and possible changes in therapy related to the use of PET scanning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single centre retrospective study of 44 patients with Hodgkin's disease who underwent both staging CT and PET prior to treatment between September 1993 and August 1998 at St. Thomas' Hospital. The number and sites of disease were assessed for each patient, documenting any stage and therapy modification prompted by PET findings.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine sites of disease were demonstrated in forty-four patients by FDG-PET compared with eighty-four by CT. As a result, 18 (40.9%) patients were upstaged, nine of these by FDG-uptake in splenic or extranodal sites not visualised on CT. Only three patients were downstaged by PET results. Eleven patients (25%) had treatment modified by PET scan findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Significantly more sites of disease were identified by PET than CT resulting in stage changes and a modification of therapy in 25% of patients. This has important implications not only for current patient management but also for the design of future clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11106116     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008368330519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  19 in total

1.  FDG PET in the management of lymphoma: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  P J Hoskin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-02-23       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Has PET become an important clinical tool in paediatric imaging?

Authors:  Klaus Hahn; Thomas Pfluger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  18F-FDG PET/CT in paediatric lymphoma: comparison with conventional imaging.

Authors:  Kevin London; Siobhan Cross; Ella Onikul; Luciano Dalla-Pozza; Robert Howman-Giles
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  PET in lymphoma: what are the oncologist's needs?

Authors:  P J Hoskin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Clinical utility of ¹⁸F FDG-PET/CT in the detection of bone marrow disease in Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  S Muzahir; M Mian; I Munir; M K Nawaz; Z S Faruqui; K A Mufti; H Bashir; N Uddin; N Siddiqui; A U R Maaz; M T Mahmood
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET and standard procedures for the pretreatment staging of children and adolescents with Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  Edita Kabickova; David Sumerauer; Eliska Cumlivska; Eva Drahokoupilova; Michaela Nekolna; Marketa Chanova; Marie Hladikova; Roman Kodet; Otakar Belohlavek
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma.

Authors:  Rebecca L Elstrom; John P Leonard
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.952

8.  Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group.

Authors:  Sally F Barrington; N George Mikhaeel; Lale Kostakoglu; Michel Meignan; Martin Hutchings; Stefan P Müeller; Lawrence H Schwartz; Emanuele Zucca; Richard I Fisher; Judith Trotman; Otto S Hoekstra; Rodney J Hicks; Michael J O'Doherty; Roland Hustinx; Alberto Biggi; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Current role of FDG PET/CT in lymphoma.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Positron emission tomography changes management, improves prognostic stratification and is superior to gallium scintigraphy in patients with low-grade lymphoma: results of a multicentre prospective study.

Authors:  Andrew M Scott; Dishan H Gunawardana; Joseph Wong; Ian Kirkwood; Rodney J Hicks; Ivan Ho Shon; Jayne E Ramshaw; Peter Robins
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.