Literature DB >> 11105648

Involvement of basal ganglia and orbitofrontal cortex in goal-directed behavior.

J R Hollerman1, L Tremblay, W Schultz.   

Abstract

An impressive array of neural processing appears to be dedicated to the extraction of reward-related information from environmental stimuli and use of this information in the generation of goal-directed behaviors. While other structures are certainly involved in these processes, the characteristics of activations seen in mesencephalic dopamine neurons, striatal neurons and neurons of the orbitofrontal cortex provide distinct examples of the different ways in which reward-related information is processed. In addition, the differences in activations seen in these three regions demonstrate the different roles they may play in goal-directed behavior. A principal role played by dopamine neurons is that of a detector of an error in reward prediction. The homogeneity of responsiveness across the population of dopamine neurons indicates that this error signal is widely broadcast to dopamine terminal regions where it could provide a teaching signal for synaptic modifications underlying the learning of goal-directed appetitive behaviors. The responses of these same neurons to conditioned stimuli associated with reward could also serve as a signal of prediction error useful for the learning of sequences of environmental stimuli leading to reward. Dopamine neuron responses to both rewards and conditioned stimuli are not contingent on the behavior executed to obtain the reward and thus appear to reflect a relatively pure signal of a reward prediction error. It is not yet clear whether these activations, and responses to novel stimuli, have an additional function in engaging neural systems involved in the representation and execution of goal-directed behaviors. This representation of goal-directed behaviors may involve the striatal regions studied, where processing of reward-related information appears to be much more heterogeneous. Different subpopulations of striatal neurons are activated at different stages in the course of goal-directed behaviors, with largely separate populations activated following presentation of conditioned stimuli, preceding reinforcers, and following reinforcers. Neurons exhibiting each of these types of activation appear to differentiate between rewarding and non-rewarding outcomes of behavioral acts and, as a population, appear to be biased towards processing reward vs. non-reward. These activations observed in the striatum were often contingent on the behavioral act associated with obtaining reward, reflecting an integration of information not observed in dopamine neurons. Another difference between reward processing in striatal neurons and dopamine neurons is the influence of predictability on neuronal responsiveness. Unlike dopamine neurons, many striatal neurons respond to predicted rewards, although at least some may reflect the relative degree of predictability in the magnitude of the responses to reward. Thus, striatal processing of reward-related information is in some ways more complex than that observed in dopamine neurons, incorporating information on behavior and potentially providing more detailed information regarding predictability. These activations could serve as a component of the neural representation of the goal, and/or the behavioral aspects of goal-directed behaviors. As such they would be of use for the execution of appropriate goal-directed behaviors in response to known environmental stimuli, as well as for generating behaviors in response to novel stimuli that may be associated with desirable goals. Neuronal activations in the orbitofrontal cortex appear to involve less integration of behavioral and reward-related information, but rather incorporate another aspect of reward, the relative motivational significance of different rewards. These activations would serve a function similar to those striatal neurons that encode exclusively reward-related information in situations in which only a single outcome is obtainable. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11105648     DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)26015-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  60 in total

1.  Motivational responses to natural and drug rewards in rats with neonatal ventral hippocampal lesions: an animal model of dual diagnosis schizophrenia.

Authors:  R Andrew Chambers; David W Self
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: effects of valence and magnitude manipulations.

Authors:  M R Delgado; H M Locke; V A Stenger; J A Fiez
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Obsessive-compulsive disorder: beyond segregated cortico-striatal pathways.

Authors:  Mohammed R Milad; Scott L Rauch
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 4.  Opponency revisited: competition and cooperation between dopamine and serotonin.

Authors:  Y-Lan Boureau; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Basal ganglia MR relaxometry in obsessive-compulsive disorder: T2 depends upon age of symptom onset.

Authors:  Stephen Correia; Emily Hubbard; Jason Hassenstab; Agustin Yip; Josef Vymazal; Vit Herynek; Jay Giedd; Dennis L Murphy; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.978

6.  Individuals with the post-traumatic stress disorder process emotions in subcortical regions irrespective of cognitive engagement: a meta-analysis of cognitive and emotional interface.

Authors:  Moon-Soo Lee; Purnima Anumagalla; Mani N Pavuluri
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.978

7.  Cell-specific spike-timing-dependent plasticity in GABAergic and cholinergic interneurons in corticostriatal rat brain slices.

Authors:  Elodie Fino; Jean-Michel Deniau; Laurent Venance
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Anticipation of monetary and social reward differently activates mesolimbic brain structures in men and women.

Authors:  Katja N Spreckelmeyer; Sören Krach; Gregor Kohls; Lena Rademacher; Arda Irmak; Kerstin Konrad; Tilo Kircher; Gerhard Gründer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  ACC to Dorsal Medial Striatum Inputs Modulate Histaminergic Itch Sensation.

Authors:  Yu-Chen Lu; Yu-Jun Wang; Bin Lu; Ming Chen; Ping Zheng; Jing-Gen Liu
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Effect of Magnitude Estimation of Pleasantness and Intensity on fMRI Activation to Taste.

Authors:  B Cerf-Ducastel; L Haase; C Murphy
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.833

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.