P Boisrenoult1, S Bricteux, P Beaufils, P Hardy. 1. Service d'Orthopédie Traumatologie, Hôpital André-Mignot, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, 78150 Le Chesnay.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We compared in vitro the efficacy of screw-plate fixation versus double screw fixation on a model of type 2 Schatzker fracture of the lateral tibial plateau. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten screw-plate fixations using a lateral prebent plate and 10 double-screw fixations (6.5 mm screws) were made on 10 pairs of non-embalmed cadaver knees after simulation of type 2 Schatzker fractures. The strength of each fixation was tested with a compression device. Criteria indicating failure were displacements greater than 2 mm of one or more fracture lines. The force applied at rupture and the stiffness of each type of fixation were compared. Wilcoxon's test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Force at rupture and stiffness of the fixation were similar for the two types of fixation. There was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) between the screw-plate and the double-screw fixations. DISCUSSION: Our findings on a model of type 2 Schatzker fractures are in agreement with previous data obtained by other authors working on models of type 1 Schatsker fractures. The biomechanical stability of the double-screw fixation is as good as that obtained with screw-plate fixation for the treatment of fractures of the lateral tibial plateau.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We compared in vitro the efficacy of screw-plate fixation versus double screw fixation on a model of type 2 Schatzker fracture of the lateral tibial plateau. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten screw-plate fixations using a lateral prebent plate and 10 double-screw fixations (6.5 mm screws) were made on 10 pairs of non-embalmed cadaver knees after simulation of type 2 Schatzker fractures. The strength of each fixation was tested with a compression device. Criteria indicating failure were displacements greater than 2 mm of one or more fracture lines. The force applied at rupture and the stiffness of each type of fixation were compared. Wilcoxon's test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Force at rupture and stiffness of the fixation were similar for the two types of fixation. There was no statistical difference (p > 0.05) between the screw-plate and the double-screw fixations. DISCUSSION: Our findings on a model of type 2 Schatzker fractures are in agreement with previous data obtained by other authors working on models of type 1 Schatsker fractures. The biomechanical stability of the double-screw fixation is as good as that obtained with screw-plate fixation for the treatment of fractures of the lateral tibial plateau.
Authors: Philipp Ahrens; Gunther Sandmann; Jan Bauer; Benjamin König; Frank Martetschläger; Dirk Müller; Sebastian Siebenlist; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Markus Neumaier; Peter Biberthaler; Ulrich Stöckle; Thomas Freude Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2012-06-24 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Ion Carrera; Pablo Eduardo Gelber; Gaetan Chary; Miguel A González-Ballester; Juan Carlos Monllau; Jerome Noailly Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-01-16 Impact factor: 3.075