Literature DB >> 11104556

A medical research council randomized trial of single agent carboplatin versus etoposide and cisplatin for advanced metastatic seminoma. MRC Testicular Tumour Working Party.

A Horwich1, R T Oliver, P M Wilkinson, G M Mead, S J Harland, M H Cullen, J T Roberts, S D Fossa, D P Dearnaley, E Lallemand, S P Stenning.   

Abstract

The UK Medical Research Council conducted this trial of carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced seminoma to compare single agent carboplatin with a standard combination of etoposide with cisplatin. The use of single agent carboplatin was expected to be associated with reduced toxicity. A total of 130 patients with advanced seminoma were randomly assigned to treatment with either single agent carboplatin (C) at a dose of 400 mg/m(2)to be corrected for glomerular filtration rate outside the range 81-120 ml min(-1)and to be administered on day 1 of a 21 day cycle to a total of 4 cycles or to etoposide + platinum (EP). The trial was designed as an equivalence study aiming to exclude a reduction in the 3-year progression-free survival in patients allocated to carboplatin of between 10 and 15%, requiring initially a target accrual of 250 patients (90% power significance level 5% (one-sided)). The trial closed after 130 patients had been randomized following recommendation by an independent data monitoring committee. At a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, 81% of patients had been followed up for at least 3 years and 19 patients have died. The estimated PFS rate (95% Confidence Intervals (CI)) at 3 years was 71% (60-82%) in patients allocated C and 81% (71-90%) in those allocated EP; the 95% CI for the difference in 3 year PFS was - 6% to +19%. The hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI 0.32-1.28) favoured EP but the difference was not statistically significant (log rank chi-squared = 1.59 P = 0.21). The 3-year survival rate was 84% (75-92%) in those allocated C, and 89% (81-96%) in those allocated EP. The hazard ratio for survival was 0.85 with 95% CI, 0.35-2.10, log rank chi-squared = 0.12, P = 0.73. The trial has not demonstrated statistically significant differences in the major survival endpoints comparing single agent carboplatin with a combination of etoposide + cisplatin. This cannot be taken as an indication of equivalence since the limited size of this trial rendered it unable to exclude a 19% lower progression-free survival and survival in those treated with single agent carboplatin which would be important clinically. Standard initial chemotherapy for advanced seminoma should be based on cisplatin combinations and the role of carboplatin awaits the outcome of further studies. Copyright 2000 Cancer Research Campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11104556      PMCID: PMC2363456          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  19 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of seminoma.

Authors:  A Horwich; D P Dearnaley
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  [Ambulatory carboplatin monotherapy in advanced seminoma].

Authors:  K P Dieckmann; G Bornhoeft; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Evaluation of optimal duration of chemotherapy in favorable-prognosis disseminated germ cell tumors: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group protocol.

Authors:  L H Einhorn; S D Williams; P J Loehrer; R Birch; R Drasga; G Omura; F A Greco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Management of postchemotherapy residual mass in patients with advanced seminoma: Indiana University experience.

Authors:  S M Schultz; L H Einhorn; D J Conces; S D Williams; P J Loehrer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Chemotherapy of disseminated seminoma.

Authors:  L H Einhorn; S D Williams
Journal:  Cancer Clin Trials       Date:  1980

6.  Combination chemotherapy in germinal cell tumors.

Authors:  M L Samuels; V J Lanzotti; P Y Holoye; L E Boyle; T L Smith; D E Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 12.111

7.  Prognostic factors for patients with advanced seminoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  S D Fosså; R T Oliver; S P Stenning; A Horwich; P Wilkinson; G Read; G M Mead; J T Roberts; G Rustin; M H Cullen; S B Kaye; S J Harland; P Cook
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 8.  Simple nontoxic treatment of advanced metastatic seminoma with carboplatin.

Authors:  A Horwich; D P Dearnaley; G M Duchesne; M Williams; M Brada; M J Peckham
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Cyclophosphamide and sequential cisplatin for advanced seminoma: long-term followup in 52 patients.

Authors:  C J Logothetis; M L Samuels; S L Ogden; F H Dexeus; C D Chong
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Advanced seminoma: the role of chemotherapy and adjunctive surgery.

Authors:  R J Motzer; G J Bosl; N L Geller; D Penenberg; A Yagoda; R Golbey; W F Whitmore; W R Fair; P Sogani; H Herr
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Regular review: Managing testicular cancer.

Authors:  D Dearnaley; R Huddart; A Horwich
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-30

2.  Extragonadal seminoma after renal transplantation and immunosuppression; treatment in the presence of renal dysfunction: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  C Kosmas; N B Tsavaris; M Vadiaka; T Chiras; J Boletis; A Kostakis
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Advances in the treatment of testicular cancer.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Kopp; Markus Kuczyk; Johannes Classen; Arnulf Stenzl; Lothar Kanz; Frank Mayer; Michael Bamberg; Jörg Thomas Hartmann
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Good-risk-advanced germ cell tumors: historical perspective and current standards of care.

Authors:  Darren R Feldman; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Why does cytotoxic chemotherapy cure only some cancers?

Authors:  Philip Savage; Justin Stebbing; Mark Bower; Tim Crook
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-11-04

Review 6.  Testicular cancer: a prototypic tumor of young adults.

Authors:  Brandon Hayes-Lattin; Craig R Nichols
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Update on management of seminoma.

Authors:  Emma J Alexander; Ingrid M White; Alan Horwich
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

Review 8.  Testicular cancer: seminoma.

Authors:  Richard David Neal; Nicholas Stuart; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2007-02-01

9.  [Pre- and paraclinical cooperative trials on testicular cancer. Background and overview of current trials].

Authors:  K-P Dieckmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Predicted cardiovascular mortality and reported cardiovascular morbidity in testicular cancer survivors.

Authors:  H S Haugnes; N Aass; S D Fosså; O Dahl; O Klepp; E A Wist; T Wilsgaard; R M Bremnes
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.