Literature DB >> 11104176

Running shared mental models as a distributed cognitive process.

A P Banks1, L J Millward.   

Abstract

Shared mental models theory normally takes the individual as its unit of analysis. This paper proposes a theoretical framework for studying shared mental models in which the model is considered to be distributed amongst the team. From this framework a cognitive process is predicted which describes how shared mental models are run. A team reasoning task requiring planning was used to illustrate this framework and test predictions derived from it. Two aspects of sharing mental models were studied; the degree of overlap between team members' mental models and the organization of the division of the model between team members. Experimental results showed that the cognitive processes used were distributed amongst the team and support was found for most, but not all, aspects of the proposed process of running a shared mental model. The organization of sharing was found to influence this process.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11104176     DOI: 10.1348/000712600161961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  5 in total

1.  Communication in ecosystem management: a case study of cross-disciplinary integration in the assessment phase of the interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project.

Authors:  Christine Haugaard Jakobsen; William J McLaughlin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson from aviation.

Authors:  H Singh; L A Petersen; E J Thomas
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-06

3.  Investigating the cognitive capacity constraints of an ICU care team using a systems engineering approach.

Authors:  Jaeyoung Park; Xiang Zhong; Yue Dong; Amelia Barwise; Brian W Pickering
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Collective-goal ascription increases cooperation in humans.

Authors:  Panagiotis Mitkidis; Jesper Sørensen; Kristoffer L Nielbo; Marc Andersen; Pierre Lienard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Healthcare system intervention for prevention of birth injuries - process evaluation of self-assessment, peer review, feedback and agreement for change.

Authors:  Monica E Nyström; Anna Westerlund; Elisabet Höög; Charlotte Millde-Luthander; Ulf Högberg; Charlotta Grunewald
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.