Literature DB >> 11103876

Context determines the type of sensitized behaviour: a brief review and a hypothesis on the role of environment in behavioural sensitization.

T Ohmori1, T Abekawa, K Ito, T Koyama.   

Abstract

Behavioural sensitization to psychostimulants may develop context-dependency in certain circumstances. Animals given a stimulant repeatedly in a test cage but not in other environments may show enhanced drug-induced behaviour in the test cage. Conditioning mechanisms have been claimed to be responsible for these phenomena. However, several recent findings are not properly accounted for by conditioning. In addition, growing evidence supports the hypothesis that behavioural sensitization reflects neural changes induced by repeated exposure to psychostimulants (the pharmacological hypothesis). However, the pharmacological hypothesis itself fails to account for environmental influences. In this paper, we propose a hypothesis on the role of environment that is complementary to the pharmacological hypothesis. According to our hypothesis, environment does not have a causal role in the development of sensitization, but it modifies the mode of expression of the sensitized behaviour. Sensitization primarily reflects a neuroadaptive change induced by repeated exposure of the neural system to psychostimulants. However, psychostimulants are known to induce different behaviours in different environments. Therefore, repeated administration of a psychostimulant in different environments would result in augmentation of different behaviours. Our hypothesis potentially accommodates various previous observations. We briefly review the literature and present our hypothesis.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11103876     DOI: 10.1097/00008877-200006000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Pharmacol        ISSN: 0955-8810            Impact factor:   2.293


  7 in total

1.  Periadolescent male but not female rats have higher motor activity in response to morphine than do adult rats.

Authors:  David A White; Clifford C Michaels; Stephen G Holtzman
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Contextual and behavioral control of antipsychotic sensitization induced by haloperidol and olanzapine.

Authors:  Chen Zhang; Ming Li
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.293

3.  Prepulse inhibition during withdrawal from an escalating dosage schedule of amphetamine.

Authors:  Holger Russig; Carol A Murphy; Joram Feldon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Increased amphetamine-induced locomotor activity, sensitization, and accumbal dopamine release in M5 muscarinic receptor knockout mice.

Authors:  Lene S Schmidt; Anthony D Miller; Deranda B Lester; Cecilie Bay-Richter; Christina Schülein; Henriette Frikke-Schmidt; Jürgen Wess; Charles D Blaha; David P D Woldbye; Anders Fink-Jensen; Gitta Wortwein
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-10-10       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Cardiovascular and subjective effects of repeated smoked cocaine administration in experienced cocaine users.

Authors:  Stephanie Collins Reed; Margaret Haney; Suzette M Evans; Nehal P Vadhan; Eric Rubin; Richard W Foltin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Hemodynamic and arrhythmogenic effects of cocaine in hypertensive individuals.

Authors:  Eric Secemsky; David Lange; David D Waters; Nora F Goldschlager; Priscilla Y Hsue
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Role of the ERK pathway in psychostimulant-induced locomotor sensitization.

Authors:  Emmanuel Valjent; Jean-Christophe Corvol; James M Trzaskos; Jean-Antoine Girault; Denis Hervé
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 3.288

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.