Literature DB >> 11102907

Changes in corticomotor excitability after fatiguing muscle contractions.

P Sacco1, G W Thickbroom, M L Byrnes, F L Mastaglia.   

Abstract

To investigate whether the type and duration of activity influences corticomotor excitability following fatiguing exercise, we compared motor evoked potential (MEP) responses of the biceps brachii to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during recovery from two different exercise regimens. Responses were recorded in both the resting state and during a weak contraction. Ten subjects performed a 60-s maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and, on a subsequent occasion, a sustained 20% MVC to the point of exhaustion. Resting MEP amplitude declined following maximal and submaximal protocols, reaching 34% and 31% of pre-exercise means, respectively (P < 0.001 for both). In contrast, mean facilitated MEP amplitude showed a smaller and more transient decrement following the sustained submaximal effort (64%; P < 0.05), but not the 60-s MVC. Abolition of the postexercise depression in resting MEP amplitude by a weak tonic contraction indicates that decreases in excitability at the spinal level contribute to the reduced corticomotor excitability observed after fatiguing exercise. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11102907     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4598(200012)23:12<1840::aid-mus7>3.0.co;2-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  18 in total

1.  Post-exercise depression in corticomotor excitability after dynamic movement: a general property of fatiguing and non-fatiguing exercise.

Authors:  W P Teo; J P Rodrigues; F L Mastaglia; G W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reduced functional activation after fatiguing exercise is not confined to primary motor areas.

Authors:  Nicola M Benwell; Frank L Mastaglia; Gary W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Central motor drive and perception of effort during fatigue in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Gary W Thickbroom; Paul Sacco; Allan G Kermode; Sarah A Archer; Michelle L Byrnes; Andrew Guilfoyle; Frank L Mastaglia
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Short-interval cortical inhibition and corticomotor excitability with fatiguing hand exercise: a central adaptation to fatigue?

Authors:  Nicola M Benwell; Paul Sacco; Geoff R Hammond; Michelle L Byrnes; Frank L Mastaglia; Gary W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of fatigue from exercise on human limb position sense.

Authors:  Trevor J Allen; Michael Leung; Uwe Proske
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Cortical excitability following passive movement.

Authors:  Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2018-11-30

7.  Single joint fatiguing exercise decreases long but not short-interval intracortical inhibition in older adults.

Authors:  Lavender A Otieno; John G Semmler; Simranjit K Sidhu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of acute resistance training modality on corticospinal excitability, intra-cortical and neuromuscular responses.

Authors:  Christopher Latella; Wei-Peng Teo; Dale Harris; Brendan Major; Dan VanderWesthuizen; Ashlee M Hendy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Corticospinal responses to sustained locomotor exercises: moving beyond single-joint studies of central fatigue.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu; Andrew G Cresswell; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Failure of activation of spinal motoneurones after muscle fatigue in healthy subjects studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Birgit Andersen; Barbro Westlund; Christian Krarup
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.