Literature DB >> 11099882

The quantity and quality of the social networks of young people with early psychosis compared with closely matched controls.

E M Macdonald1, R L Hayes, A J Baglioni.   

Abstract

This study compares the social networks and perceived social support of 26 people with early psychosis and 26 people without a mental illness. The two groups were closely matched for age, sex, education level, and employment and relationship status, and had equivalent levels of depression. There were no differences between the two groups in the amount of perceived social support, number of family members, and number of participants with acquaintances. However, the psychosis group identified significantly smaller networks, t (50)=-2.34, P=0.024, with fewer friends, t (48)=-3.61, P=0.001, fewer people to turn to in a crisis, t (22.97)=-2.34, P=0.028, and a higher likelihood of service providers as members, chi(2)(1)=7.02, P=0.008. Given the important relationship between strong social networks and high levels of community functioning and tenure, future research needs to evaluate the type of social support most beneficial for people with early psychosis and to develop strategies to maintain and facilitate that support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11099882     DOI: 10.1016/s0920-9964(00)00024-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  27 in total

1.  Social integration of people with severe mental illness: relationships between symptom severity, professional assistance, and natural support.

Authors:  Jack Tsai; Rani A Desai; Robert A Rosenheck
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Social value of supported employment for psychosocial program participants.

Authors:  Paul J Barreira; Miriam Cohen Tepper; Paul B Gold; Dana Holley; Cathaleene Macias
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2011-03

Review 3.  [Early recognition and intervention for schizophrenia].

Authors:  N Mossaheb; G Wiesegger; G P Amminger; S Kasper; J Tauscher
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Social integration of people with serious mental illness: network transactions and satisfaction.

Authors:  Yin-Ling Irene Wong; Jason Matejkowski; Sungkyu Lee
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 1.505

5.  Awareness of treatment history in family and friends, and mental health care seeking propensity.

Authors:  François L Thériault; Ian Colman
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Housing and home-leaving experiences of young adults with psychotic disorders: a comparative qualitative study.

Authors:  Laurence Roy; Jacqueline Rousseau; Pierre Fortier; Jean-Pierre Mottard
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2012-07-27

7.  Social relationships in young adults at ultra high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Briana L Robustelli; Raeana E Newberry; Mark A Whisman; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  PARENTAL DEATH IN THE LIVES OF PEOPLE WITH SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS.

Authors:  Danson Jones; John Harvey; Debra Giza; Charles Rodican; Paul J Barreira; Cathaleene Macias
Journal:  J Loss Trauma       Date:  2003-10-01

9.  Validation of the modified DUKE-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Laia Mas-Expósito; Juan Antonio Amador-Campos; Juana Gómez-Benito; Lluís Lalucat-Jo
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Types of social capital resources and self-rated health among the Norwegian adult population.

Authors:  Abdi A Gele; Ivan Harsløf
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2010-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.