INTRODUCTION: Rapid cycling (RC) in bipolar disorders is widely believed to predict future morbidity and poor treatment response, although empirical testing of its predictive utility remains limited. METHODS: In 360 DSM-IV bipolar I (N=218) and II (N=142) disorder subjects (64% women) followed over an average of 13.3 years, we evaluated factors associated with RC status with bivariate and multivariate techniques, and response to lithium maintenance treatment (recurrence rates, time ill, survival analysis of time to recurrence on lithium). RESULTS: RC risk (15.6% of cases) was 5. 1-times greater in bipolar II vs. I subjects (30.3%/6.0%), in minor excess in women vs. men (17.9%/11.5%), and associated with premorbid cyclothymia, depressive first episodes, older onset age, and being employed or married. Before lithium, RC vs. non-RC cases had more mean total (3.9/1.2), manic, and depressive episodes/year, and greater percent time ill (60%/38%). During treatment, prior RC status was unrelated to time to first recurrence and other measures of morbidity and improvement including percent time ill, although depressive episodes were 2.7-times more frequent, and there was 13.7% less chance of full protection from all recurrences in RC cases. LIMITATIONS: The study is naturalistic, without random assignment or blind assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The RC bipolar subtype was strongly associated with type II diagnosis, higher average prelithium episode frequency and percent time ill, and weakly with female sex, but not with greater overall morbidity during treatment.
INTRODUCTION: Rapid cycling (RC) in bipolar disorders is widely believed to predict future morbidity and poor treatment response, although empirical testing of its predictive utility remains limited. METHODS: In 360 DSM-IV bipolar I (N=218) and II (N=142) disorder subjects (64% women) followed over an average of 13.3 years, we evaluated factors associated with RC status with bivariate and multivariate techniques, and response to lithium maintenance treatment (recurrence rates, time ill, survival analysis of time to recurrence on lithium). RESULTS: RC risk (15.6% of cases) was 5. 1-times greater in bipolar II vs. I subjects (30.3%/6.0%), in minor excess in women vs. men (17.9%/11.5%), and associated with premorbid cyclothymia, depressive first episodes, older onset age, and being employed or married. Before lithium, RC vs. non-RC cases had more mean total (3.9/1.2), manic, and depressive episodes/year, and greater percent time ill (60%/38%). During treatment, prior RC status was unrelated to time to first recurrence and other measures of morbidity and improvement including percent time ill, although depressive episodes were 2.7-times more frequent, and there was 13.7% less chance of full protection from all recurrences in RC cases. LIMITATIONS: The study is naturalistic, without random assignment or blind assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The RC bipolar subtype was strongly associated with type II diagnosis, higher average prelithium episode frequency and percent time ill, and weakly with female sex, but not with greater overall morbidity during treatment.
Authors: A Carlo Altamura; Massimiliano Buoli; Bruno Cesana; Bernardo Dell'Osso; Gianluigi Tacchini; Umberto Albert; Andrea Fagiolini; Andrea de Bartolomeis; Giuseppe Maina; Emilio Sacchetti Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Tomas Hajek; Margaret Hahn; Claire Slaney; Julie Garnham; Joshua Green; Martina Růzicková; Peter Zvolský; Martin Alda Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Wayne Macfadden; Caleb M Adler; Ibrahim Turkoz; John T Haskins; Norris Turner; Larry Alphs Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2011-10-28 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Anne Berghöfer; Martin Alda; Mazda Adli; Christopher Baethge; Michael Bauer; Tom Bschor; Paul Grof; Bruno Müller-Oerlinghausen; Janusz K Rybakowski; Alexandra Suwalska; Andrea Pfennig Journal: Int J Bipolar Disord Date: 2013-07-31