Literature DB >> 11099319

Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer.

A Pollack1, G K Zagars, L G Smith, J J Lee, A C von Eschenbach, J A Antolak, G Starkschall, I Rosen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of radiotherapy dose on prostate cancer patient outcome and biopsy positivity in a phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 305 stage T1 through T3 patients were randomized to receive 70 Gy or 78 Gy of external-beam radiotherapy between 1993 and 1998. Of these, 301 were assessable; stratification was based on pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level (PSA). Dose was prescribed to the isocenter at 2 Gy per fraction. All patients underwent planning pelvic computed tomography scan to confirm prostate position. Treatment failure was defined as an increasing PSA on three consecutive follow-up visits or the initiation of salvage treatment. Median follow-up was 40 months.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were randomized to the 70-Gy arm and 151 to the 78-Gy arm. The difference in freedom from biochemical and/or disease failure (FFF) rates of 69% and 79% for the 70-Gy and 78-Gy groups, respectively, at 5 years was marginally significant (log-rank P: =.058). Multiple-covariate Cox proportional hazards regression showed that the study randomization was an independent correlate of FFF, along with pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and stage. The patients who benefited most from the 8-Gy dose escalation were those with a pretreatment PSA of more than 10 ng/mL; 5-year FFF rates were 48% and 75% (P: =.011) for the 70-Gy and 78-Gy arms, respectively. There was no difference between the arms ( approximately 80% 5-year FFF) when the pretreatment PSA was < or = 10 ng/mL.
CONCLUSION: A modest dose increase of 8 Gy using conformal radiotherapy resulted in a substantial improvement in prostate cancer FFF rates for patients with a pretreatment PSA of more than 10 ng/mL. These findings document that local persistence of prostate cancer in intermediate- to high-risk patients is a major problem when doses of 70 Gy or less are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11099319     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.23.3904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  89 in total

1.  Clinical implementation of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with ERGO++.

Authors:  Dirk Wolff; Florian Stieler; Brigitte Hermann; Katharina Heim; Sven Clausen; Jens Fleckenstein; Martin Polednik; Volker Steil; Frederik Wenz; Frank Lohr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  [Treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  M P Wirth; O W Hakenberg; M Fröhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Fused radioimmunoscintigraphy for treatment planning.

Authors:  Rodney J Ellis; Deborah A Kaminsky
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

4.  On the impact of functional imaging accuracy on selective boosting IMRT.

Authors:  Y Kim; W A Tomé
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  [Radiotherapy in prostate cancer].

Authors:  U Ganswindt; C Belka
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Is it beneficial to selectively boost high-risk tumor subvolumes? A comparison of selectively boosting high-risk tumor subvolumes versus homogeneous dose escalation of the entire tumor based on equivalent EUD plans.

Authors:  Yusung Kim; Wolfgang A Tome
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 8.  [Adjuvant and neoadjuvant drug therapy for prostate cancer].

Authors:  K Miller; M Lein; M Schostak; M Schrader
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Racial influence on biochemical disease-free survival in men treated with external-beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Rosser; Deborah A Kuban; Sang-Joon Lee; Lawrence B Levy; Curtis Pettaway; Ashish M Kamat; Ramsey Chichakli; Andrew Lee; Rex M Cheung; Ricardo Sanchez-Ortiz; Louis L Pisters
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Neoadjuvant LHRH analog plus estramustine phosphate combined with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer: a randomized study.

Authors:  Daisaku Hirano; Yusuke Nagane; Katsuhiko Satoh; Junichi Mochida; Shuji Sugimoto; Taketo Ichinose; Satoru Takahashi; Toshiya Maebayashi; Tsutomu Saitoh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.