Literature DB >> 11098896

Backscatter towards the monitor ion chamber in high-energy photon and electron beams: charge integration versus Monte Carlo simulation.

F Verhaegen1, R Symonds-Tayler, H H Liu, A E Nahum.   

Abstract

In some linear accelerators, the charge collected by the monitor ion chamber is partly caused by backscattered particles from accelerator components downstream from the chamber. This influences the output of the accelerator and also has to be taken into account when output factors are derived from Monte Carlo simulations. In this work, the contribution of backscattered particles to the monitor ion chamber response of a Varian 2100C linac was determined for photon beams (6, 10 MV) and for electron beams (6, 12, 20 MeV). The experimental procedure consisted of charge integration from the target in a photon beam or from the monitor ion chamber in electron beams. The Monte Carlo code EGS4/BEAM was used to study the contribution of backscattered particles to the dose deposited in the monitor ion chamber. Both measurements and simulations showed a linear increase in backscatter fraction with decreasing field size for photon and electron beams. For 6 MV and 10 MV photon beams, a 2-3% increase in backscatter was obtained for a 0.5 x 0.5 cm2 field compared to a 40 x 40 cm2 field. The results for the 6 MV beam were slightly higher than for the 10 MV beam. For electron beams (6, 12, 20 MeV), an increase of similar magnitude was obtained from measurements and simulations for 6 MeV electrons. For higher energy electron beams a smaller increase in backscatter fraction was found. The problem is of less importance for electron beams since large variations of field size for a single electron energy usually do not occur.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11098896     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/11/304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  Prediction of back-scatter radiations to a beam monitor chamber of medical linear accelerators by use of the digitized target-current-pulse analysis method.

Authors:  Yusuke Suzuki; Naoki Hayashi; Hideki Kato; Hiroshi Fukuma; Yasujiro Hirose; Makoto Kawano; Yoshio Nishii; Masaru Nakamura; Takashi Mukouyama
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-10-25

2.  Jaw position uncertainty and adjacent fields in breast cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Emma Hedin; Anna Bäck; Roumiana Chakarova
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Nontarget and Out-of-Field Doses from Electron Beam Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Natalia Matuszak; Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Agnieszka Skrobala; Adam Ryczkowski; Piotr Romanski; Igor Piotrowski; Katarzyna Kulcenty; Wiktoria Maria Suchorska; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

4.  Monte Carlo modeling of HD120 multileaf collimator on Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator for verification of 6X and 6X FFF VMAT SABR treatment plans.

Authors:  Alanah M Bergman; Ermias Gete; Cheryl Duzenli; Tony Teke
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.