OBJECTIVE: The Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) score is correlated with age and sociodemographic variables. The aim of the study was to determine an individualized CAMCOG cut-off score for dementia, taking such correlates into account. METHOD: From the general population 150 people aged 65-84 years were examined with CAMDEX which includes CAMCOG, and a neuropsychological test battery. Data from 130 non-demented people were entered in setwise multiple regression analyses to identify variables predicting the CAMCOG score. RESULTS: The variables age, social class, matrimonial status, general knowledge and intellectual level explained 66% of the variance of the CAMCOG scores. A cut-off defined as a difference between actual and predicted CAMCOG score < or = -4.41 resulted in a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 89.2% for very mild to moderate dementia. CONCLUSION: It is possible to determine an individualized CAMCOG cut-off score for dementia in its early stages.
OBJECTIVE: The Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) score is correlated with age and sociodemographic variables. The aim of the study was to determine an individualized CAMCOG cut-off score for dementia, taking such correlates into account. METHOD: From the general population 150 people aged 65-84 years were examined with CAMDEX which includes CAMCOG, and a neuropsychological test battery. Data from 130 non-demented people were entered in setwise multiple regression analyses to identify variables predicting the CAMCOG score. RESULTS: The variables age, social class, matrimonial status, general knowledge and intellectual level explained 66% of the variance of the CAMCOG scores. A cut-off defined as a difference between actual and predicted CAMCOG score < or = -4.41 resulted in a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 89.2% for very mild to moderate dementia. CONCLUSION: It is possible to determine an individualized CAMCOG cut-off score for dementia in its early stages.
Authors: Fred Andersen; Torgeir A Engstad; Bjørn Straume; Matti Viitanen; Dag S Halvorsen; Samuel Hykkerud; Kjell Sjøbrend Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2010-04-29 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Pim van den Dungen; Eric P Moll van Charante; Peter M van de Ven; Gerbrand Foppes; Jos P C M van Campen; Harm W J van Marwijk; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Hein P J van Hout Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 3.921