Literature DB >> 11097442

Stabilized subcutaneous ulnar nerve transposition with immediate range of motion. Long-term follow-up.

B T Black1, O A Barron, P F Townsend, S Z Glickel, R G Eaton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve at the elbow produces generally good results regardless of whether the nerve is transposed subcutaneously, intramuscularly, or submuscularly. The eventual recovery of nerve function is related less to the specific surgical technique than to the severity of the intrinsic nerve pathology. A primary variable in surgical management is the duration of postoperative elbow immobilization. The purpose of this study was to review the longterm results of a specific technique of subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve that utilizes a stabilizing fasciodermal sling. The study compared the results of immediate and late institution of a range of motion postoperatively.
METHODS: Forty-seven patients with fifty-one elbows were reexamined, by an investigator who had not been involved in their treatment, at a minimum of two years (range, twenty-four months to fourteen years) after an anterior transposition. Of the fifty-one elbows, twenty-one were immobilized for two to three weeks whereas thirty were managed with an immediate range of motion.
RESULTS: At the latest follow-up evaluation, there were occasional, mild paresthesias in 16 percent of the limbs and there was still subjective weakness of 19 percent. Both pinch and grip strength had increased substantially. No patient had lost elbow motion. A positive Tinel sign persisted in 31 percent of the limbs, but it was mildly positive in most of them. The elbow flexion test was uniformly negative. The results for 92 percent of the limbs were satisfactory to the patients, who stated that they would undergo the same procedure again if necessary. Overall, 73 percent of the limbs had an excellent result; 18 percent, a good result; 4 percent, a fair result; and 6 percent, a poor result. With the numbers available, no significant difference could be detected, with regard to these outcomes, between the group managed with elbow immobilization and that managed with immediate elbow mobilization. However, patients treated with a postoperative cast returned to work at an average of thirty days after surgery whereas the group treated with immediate motion of the elbow returned to work at an average of ten days.
CONCLUSIONS: This technique of stabilized subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve yielded predictably good results for a wide spectrum of patients. Patients returned to their occupation sooner when the elbow had been mobilized immediately.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11097442     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200011000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

1.  Surgical options for ulnar nerve entrapment: an example of individualized decision analysis.

Authors:  Jaime Gasco
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-02-25

Review 2.  Is routine ulnar nerve transposition necessary in open release of stiff elbows? Our experience and a literature review.

Authors:  Chen Shuai; Yan Hede; Liu Shen; Ouyang Yuanming; Ruan Hongjiang; Fan Cunyi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Stabilized subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hashiguchi; Hiromoto Ito; Takuya Sawaizumi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Return to play rates after ulnar nerve transposition and decompression surgery: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J Hadley; Anant Dixit; John Kunkel; Alex E White; Michael G Ciccotti; Steven B Cohen; Christopher C Dodson
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-02-09

5.  Subcutaneous vs Submuscular Ulnar Nerve Transposition in Moderate Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Dhia A K Jaddue; Salwan A Saloo; Arkan S Sayed-Noor
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2009-08-27

6.  SUBCUTANEOUS ANTERIOR TRANSPOSITION FOR TREATMENT OF CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: IS THIS METHOD SAFE AND EFFECTIVE?

Authors:  Sara Lima; João Freitas Correia; Rui Moura Martins; Jorge Miguel Alves; João Palheiras; Carlos de Sousa
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.