Literature DB >> 11097285

Methods for detecting age-related maculopathy: a comparison between photographic and clinical assessment.

G Tikellis1, L D Robman, A Harper, J J McNeil, H R Taylor, C A McCarty.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the sensitivity, specificity and overall agreement between photographic and clinical assessment in detecting age-related maculopathy (ARM) features in the context of an epidemiological study, the Vitamin E, Cataract and Age-related Maculopathy Study (VECAT).
METHODS: A total of 1204 volunteers aged between 55 and 80 years of age, who were enrolled in the VECAT Study, had both slit-lamp biomicroscopy examination and fundus photos taken as part of the baseline ophthalmic examination. The Nidek 3-DX fundus camera (Nidek, Gamagori, Japan) was used to produce paired, one-framed, coloured, 15 degrees stereoslides of the macular area at a fixed angle. An International Classification and Grading System for Age-related Maculopathy and Age-related Macular Degeneration was used to grade the stereoslides. Agreement in the detection of drusen, pigment abnormalities, and late stage ARM features was assessed using unweignted kappa statistic. Cases of disagreement were verified using clinical data records, grading documentation and the review of stereoslides.
RESULTS: Macula status was available for 2386 eyes. For drusen of size < 63 microm, sensitivity was 47%, specificity was 68% with a kappa value of 0.20. For drusden > or = 125 microm, sensitivity and specificity were > or =81%. Kappa values ranged from 0.56 to 0.71. Levels of agreement for pigment abnormalities and late ARM were in the substantial range (i.e. kappa values from 0.70 to 1.00).
CONCLUSIONS: Slit-lamp biomicroscopy was found to be comparable to photograding (using the Nidek 3-DX fundus camera) for detecting features pertaining to ARM. However, given the objectivity and permanency of stereoslides, photograding is still the more reliable and the preferred system of assessing ARM in the context of an epidemiological study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11097285     DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2000.00336.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  5 in total

Review 1.  The cost-effectiveness of three screening alternatives for people with diabetes with no or early diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  David B Rein; John S Wittenborn; Xinzhi Zhang; Benjamin A Allaire; Michael S Song; Ronald Klein; Jinan B Saaddine
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of dark adaptometry for detection of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Gregory R Jackson; Ingrid U Scott; Ivana K Kim; David A Quillen; Alessandro Iannaccone; John G Edwards
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  The cost-effectiveness of Welcome to Medicare visual acuity screening and a possible alternative welcome to medicare eye evaluation among persons without diagnosed diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  David B Rein; John S Wittenborn; Xinzhi Zhang; Thomas J Hoerger; Ping Zhang; Barbara Eden Kobrin Klein; Kris E Lee; Ronald Klein; Jinan B Saaddine
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05

4.  Vitamin E supplementation and macular degeneration: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hugh R Taylor; Gabriella Tikellis; Luba D Robman; Catherine A McCarty; John J McNeil
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-06

5.  Characteristics of dynamic processing in the visual field of patients with age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  Werner Eisenbarth; Manfred Mackeben; Dorothe A Poggel; Hans Strasburger
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.117

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.