Literature DB >> 11097247

Epidemiological perspective on prophylactic pinning in patients with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

F P Castro1, J T Bennett, K Doulens.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review was to determine whether the literature supports in situ prophylactic pinning of the hip contralateral to a hip with a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Three hundred twenty-five articles on SCFE between 1931 and 1998 were reviewed. Two hundred six studies were used to establish normative data. Patients with a unilateral SCFE were 2,335 times more likely to develop a SCFE in the contralateral hip when compared to children in the general population experiencing an initial SCFE. Because a majority of these sequential SCFEs were detected and treated early, we concluded that close follow-up and not prophylactic pinning was most supported by the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11097247     DOI: 10.1097/00004694-200011000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  23 in total

1.  Subclinical bilateral involvement of the hip in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Yusuke Kohno; Yasuharu Nakashima; Toshio Kitano; Tomoyuki Nakamura; Kazuyuki Takamura; Mio Akiyama; Daisuke Hara; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Masanobu Ohishi; Satoshi Hamai; Iwamoto Yukihide
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Patients with unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis have antecedent symptoms.

Authors:  Thomas G McPartland; Wudbhav N Sankar; Young-Jo Kim; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Continued growth of the hip after fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis using a single cannulated screw with a proximal threading.

Authors:  Frédéric Sailhan; Aurélien Courvoisier; Océane Brunet; Franck Chotel; Jérôme Berard
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Is there a persistent capital femoral epiphysis growth after screw fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis?

Authors:  Camille Sleth; François Bauzou; Claudia De Cristo; Fanny Alkar; Pauline Joly-Monrigal; Clément Jeandel; Jérôme Cottalorda; Djamel Louahem M'Sabah; Marion Delpont
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2022-04-09

5.  A reduction in body mass index lowers risk for bilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Adam Y Nasreddine; Benton E Heyworth; David Zurakowski; Mininder S Kocher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The fate of hips that are not prophylactically pinned after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Yaser M K Baghdadi; A Noelle Larson; Rafael J Sierra; Hamlet A Peterson; Anthony A Stans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  What are the risks of prophylactic pinning to prevent contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis?

Authors:  Wudbhav N Sankar; Eduardo N Novais; Christopher Lee; Ali A Al-Omari; Paul D Choi; Benjamin J Shore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  In situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis with Steinmann pins.

Authors:  Trude G Lehmann; Ingvild Ø Engesæter; Lene B Laborie; Karen Rosendahl; Stein Atle Lie; Lars B Engesæter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Review for the generalist: evaluation of pediatric hip pain.

Authors:  Kristin M Houghton
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 3.054

10.  Review for the generalist: evaluation of anterior knee pain.

Authors:  Kristin M Houghton
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 3.054

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.