Literature DB >> 11097241

Diagnosing childhood acetabular dysplasia using the lateral margin of the sourcil.

H T Kim1, J I Kim, C I Yoo.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the lateral edge of the acetabulum and locate the most accurate marking point on a plain radiograph when measuring the acetabular index (AI) and the center-edge (CE) angle. We studied the radiographs of 53 patients with unilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), all of whom were treated by closed reduction. In addition to plain radiographs, eight patients had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, 16 had three-dimensional computed tomography (3-DCT) studies, and six underwent arthrographic studies. We found that the most lateral bony margin of the acetabular roof on plain radiograph represents the anterolateral portion of the acetabulum. The lateral end of the sourcil indicates the lateral margin of the mid-superior portion of the acetabulum. To reduce intra- and interobserver errors, we suggest that when measuring the AI and the CE angle, physicians clearly indicate in the medical records which of the two marking points was used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11097241     DOI: 10.1097/00004694-200011000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  11 in total

1.  Reliability of hip migration index in children with cerebral palsy: the classic and modified methods.

Authors:  Sun Mi Kim; Eun Geol Sim; Seong Gyu Lim; Eun Sook Park
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2012-02-29

2.  Teardrop and sourcil line (TSL): a novel radiographic sign that predicts residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) in DDH after closed reduction.

Authors:  Peng Huang; Dahui Wang; Yueqiang Mo; Yiming Zheng; Bo Ning
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2022-04

3.  Interobserver repeatability of measurements on computed tomography images of lax canine hip joints from youth to maturity.

Authors:  Mandi J Lopez; Kechia M Davis; Susan L Jeffrey-Borger; Mark D Markel; Christy Rettenmund
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.495

4.  A comparative radiographic morphometric analysis to assess the normal radiological morphology of the adult hip in indian population.

Authors:  Balaji Zacharia; K Mohammed Fawas
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-17

5.  Discrepancies in measuring acetabular coverage: revisiting the anterior and lateral center edge angles.

Authors:  Joey A Hanson; Ashley L Kapron; Kathryn M Swenson; Travis G Maak; Christopher L Peters; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-06-13

6.  Prediction of the requirement of open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Nabil Alassaf
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Reliability of the sourcil method of acetabular index measurement in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  C L Maddock; S Noor; A Kothari; C S Bradley; S P Kelley
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  The lateral edge and sourcil acetabular indices for surgical decision-making in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Alpesh Kothari; Saqib Noor; Connor L Maddock; Jan H H Vanderstappen; Catharine S Bradley; Simon P Kelley
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Which Acetabular Landmarks are the Most Useful for Measuring the Acetabular Index and Center-edge Angle in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip? A Comparison of Two Methods.

Authors:  Chang Ho Shin; Eunkyu Yang; Chaemoon Lim; Won Joon Yoo; In Ho Choi; Tae-Joon Cho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Defining the lateral edge of the femoroacetabular articulation: correlation analysis between radiographs and computed tomography.

Authors:  Ashish Mittal; James D Bomar; Megan E Jeffords; Ming-Tung Huang; Dennis R Wenger; Vidyadhar V Upasani
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.