OBJECTIVE: To establish a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of esophageal cancer, we investigated an alternative mechanism of immunotherapy for sensitizing target cells to effector cells. METHODS: Six human esophageal cancer cell lines were used. The expression of Fas antigen on tumor cells was determined by flow cytometry. The cytotoxic effect of cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum (CDDP) and anti-Fas antibody was evaluated using an MTT assay. The cytotoxic activity of LAK cells was measured by a (51)Cr release assay. RESULTS: Five out of six esophageal cancer cell lines expressed Fas antigen at various levels (26.2-61.5%), and Fas expression increased after CDDP treatment. The antitumor effect of anti-Fas antibody on the esophageal cancer cell line and the antitumor effect of LAK cells activated by IL-2 were enhanced by pretreatment with CDDP. After concanamycin A treatment to specifically evaluate Fas-dependent cytotoxicity, LAK cells expressing Fas ligand killed only Fas-positive cells, but not Fas-negative cells. An anti-Fas neutralizing antibody inhibited this cytotoxicity. DNA fragmentation was shown in a cell line that was treated with CDDP and anti-Fas antibody, and also in the targeted esophageal cancer cell line cocultured with LAK cells. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a potential clinical application of CDDP as a Fas inducer to make esophageal tumors susceptible to Fas antigen and LAK cytotoxicity. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.
OBJECTIVE: To establish a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of esophageal cancer, we investigated an alternative mechanism of immunotherapy for sensitizing target cells to effector cells. METHODS: Six humanesophageal cancer cell lines were used. The expression of Fas antigen on tumor cells was determined by flow cytometry. The cytotoxic effect of cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum (CDDP) and anti-Fas antibody was evaluated using an MTT assay. The cytotoxic activity of LAK cells was measured by a (51)Cr release assay. RESULTS: Five out of six esophageal cancer cell lines expressed Fas antigen at various levels (26.2-61.5%), and Fas expression increased after CDDP treatment. The antitumor effect of anti-Fas antibody on the esophageal cancer cell line and the antitumor effect of LAK cells activated by IL-2 were enhanced by pretreatment with CDDP. After concanamycin A treatment to specifically evaluate Fas-dependent cytotoxicity, LAK cells expressing Fas ligand killed only Fas-positive cells, but not Fas-negative cells. An anti-Fas neutralizing antibody inhibited this cytotoxicity. DNA fragmentation was shown in a cell line that was treated with CDDP and anti-Fas antibody, and also in the targeted esophageal cancer cell line cocultured with LAK cells. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a potential clinical application of CDDP as a Fas inducer to make esophageal tumors susceptible to Fas antigen and LAKcytotoxicity. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Sofia R Gameiro; Jorge A Caballero; Jack P Higgins; David Apelian; James W Hodge Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Alexander Gelbard; Charlie T Garnett; Scott I Abrams; Vyomesh Patel; J Silvio Gutkind; Claudia Palena; Kwong-Yok Tsang; Jeffrey Schlom; James W Hodge Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: James W Hodge; Charlie T Garnett; Benedetto Farsaci; Claudia Palena; Kwong-Yok Tsang; Soldano Ferrone; Sofia R Gameiro Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-03-16 Impact factor: 7.396