OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine prospectively whether an intensive regimen of daily, high-dose interferon would improve the response rate for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with unfavorable virological characteristics. METHODS: A total of 104 patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomized at eight centers to receive interferon alfa-2b at a dose of 5 million units (MU) daily or 3 MU t.i.w. for a period of 24 wk. Patients were prospectively randomized by low or high viral burden and stratified by genotype. HCV RNA was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and response rates were compared between the dosage regimens. RESULTS:HCV RNA levels dropped more rapidly to lower levels in the group treated with 5 MU daily. In this group, the initial virological response (IR) at wk 12 and the end-of-treatment response (ETR) at wk 24 were double that of patients treated with standard interferon (66% vs 33% and 48% vs 24%, p < 0.01). Sustained response rates were low for both dose groups (14% vs 4%, p = 0.08). Genotype-related differences in initial response rates were present in the standard dose group (63% non-1 genotype vs 24% genotype 1; p = 0.005) but not in those treated with 5 MU daily (66% vs 67%, p = NS). Using multivariate analysis, only the interferon dose was associated with IR and ETR (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Daily, high dose interferon rapidly dropped HCV RNA and increased initial and end-of-treatment response rates when compared to t.i.w. regimens. This effect, independent of viral burden and genotype, suggests that patients with unfavorable viral characteristics might benefit from an intensive regimen that promotes rapid viral clearance. These data support further study of the use of high-dose induction regimens. However, improvements in sustained response rates will require additional therapeutic maneuvers such as prolonged therapy or the adjunctive use of ribavirin.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine prospectively whether an intensive regimen of daily, high-dose interferon would improve the response rate for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with unfavorable virological characteristics. METHODS: A total of 104 patients with chronic hepatitis C were randomized at eight centers to receive interferon alfa-2b at a dose of 5 million units (MU) daily or 3 MU t.i.w. for a period of 24 wk. Patients were prospectively randomized by low or high viral burden and stratified by genotype. HCV RNA was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and response rates were compared between the dosage regimens. RESULTS: HCV RNA levels dropped more rapidly to lower levels in the group treated with 5 MU daily. In this group, the initial virological response (IR) at wk 12 and the end-of-treatment response (ETR) at wk 24 were double that of patients treated with standard interferon (66% vs 33% and 48% vs 24%, p < 0.01). Sustained response rates were low for both dose groups (14% vs 4%, p = 0.08). Genotype-related differences in initial response rates were present in the standard dose group (63% non-1 genotype vs 24% genotype 1; p = 0.005) but not in those treated with 5 MU daily (66% vs 67%, p = NS). Using multivariate analysis, only the interferon dose was associated with IR and ETR (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Daily, high dose interferon rapidly dropped HCV RNA and increased initial and end-of-treatment response rates when compared to t.i.w. regimens. This effect, independent of viral burden and genotype, suggests that patients with unfavorable viral characteristics might benefit from an intensive regimen that promotes rapid viral clearance. These data support further study of the use of high-dose induction regimens. However, improvements in sustained response rates will require additional therapeutic maneuvers such as prolonged therapy or the adjunctive use of ribavirin.
Authors: Holger-G Hass; Christian Kreysel; Johannes Fischinger; Josef Menzel; Stephan Kaiser Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-09-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: G Montalto; S Tripi; O Vuturo; G Di Gaetano; M Soresi; A Spadaro; A Aiello; M Russello; R Benigno; R Siciliano Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Hernando J Gonzalez; Samuel B Ho; John B Gross; Craig Peine; Daniel McKee; Theresa Smith Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Dickens Theodore; Mitchell L Shiffman; Richard K Sterling; Christine J Bruno; Jeffrey Weinstein; Jeffrey S Crippin; Gabriel Garcia; Teresa L Wright; Hari Conjeevaram; Rajender K Reddy; Frederick S Nolte; Michael W Fried Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Vijayaprakash Suppiah; Max Moldovan; Golo Ahlenstiel; Thomas Berg; Martin Weltman; Maria Lorena Abate; Margaret Bassendine; Ulrich Spengler; Gregory J Dore; Elizabeth Powell; Stephen Riordan; David Sheridan; Antonina Smedile; Vincenzo Fragomeli; Tobias Müller; Melanie Bahlo; Graeme J Stewart; David R Booth; Jacob George Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-09-13 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Jessica Wagoner; Chihiro Morishima; Tyler N Graf; Nicholas H Oberlies; Elodie Teissier; Eve-Isabelle Pécheur; John E Tavis; Stephen J Polyak Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 3.240