Literature DB >> 11095326

An endoscopic comparison of the effects of alendronate and risedronate on upper gastrointestinal mucosae.

F Lanza1, H Schwartz, B Sahba, H M Malaty, T Musliner, R Reyes, H Quan, D Y Graham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate have been reported to have upper gastrointestinal (GI) safety and tolerability profiles comparable to those of placebo. Nevertheless, both agents have demonstrated similar potential for irritation of gastric mucosa at high doses in preclinical studies. The present study compared the potential for alendronate and risedronate to produce endoscopic upper GI mucosal irritation using the highest approved dosage regimens for the two agents.
METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which a total of 235 patients (men or postmenopausal women, aged 45-80 yr) with normal upper GI endoscopy at baseline received 28-day treatments with the following: alendronate 40 mg/day (N = 90), risedronate 30 mg/day (N = 89), placebo (N = 36), or placebo with aspirin 650 mg q.i.d. for the last 7 days (N = 20). Endoscopy was repeated on day 29 using standardized scoring scales.
RESULTS: After 28 days of treatment, the alendronate and risedronate groups had comparable mean gastric and duodenal erosion scores that were significantly lower than those of the aspirin group. Esophageal scores were comparable in all groups. Gastric ulcers and/or large numbers of gastric erosions occurred in approximately 3% of alendronate and risedronate patients versus 60% with aspirin. Both bisphosphonates were clinically well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: The potential for gastroduodenal irritation is similar for alendronate and risedronate and is markedly less than for aspirin. The findings of this study, together with the large placebo-controlled clinical trial experience with both agents and extensive epidemiological data for alendronate, suggest that the risk for clinically important gastric irritation with these bisphosphonates is very low, even at the highest available doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11095326     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03258.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  19 in total

Review 1.  Alendronate and risedronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: clinical profiles of the once-weekly and once-daily dosing formulations.

Authors:  Ronald Emkey
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-07-19

Review 2.  Alendronate: an update of its use in osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Sharpe; S Noble; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Benefit-risk assessment of raloxifene in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Ann Cranney; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Prescription-event monitoring study on 13,164 patients prescribed risedronate in primary care in England.

Authors:  Beate Aurich Barrera; Lynda Wilton; Scott Harris; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Risedronate: a review of its pharmacological properties and clinical use in resorptive bone disease.

Authors:  C J Dunn; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  The impact of fragility fracture on health-related quality of life : the importance of antifracture therapy.

Authors:  Ted Xenodemetropoulos; Shawn Davison; George Ioannidis; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Long-term tolerability of the bisphosphonates in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a comparative review.

Authors:  Raheem B Kherani; Alexandra Papaioannou; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Bisphosphonate increases risk of gastroduodenal ulcer in rheumatoid arthritis patients on long-term nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug therapy.

Authors:  Kazumasa Miyake; Masanori Kusunoki; Yoko Shinji; Tomotaka Shindo; Tetsuro Kawagoe; Seiji Futagami; Katya Gudis; Taku Tsukui; Atsushi Nakajima; Choitsu Sakamoto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 9.  Safety considerations with bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  William Strampel; Ronald Emkey; Roberto Civitelli
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Clodronic acid formulations available in Europe and their use in osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  Bruno Frediani; Luca Cavalieri; Giovanni Cremonesi
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.