Literature DB >> 11095170

An investigation of the diagnostic value of bilateral femoral neck bone mineral density measurements.

G W Petley1, P A Taylor, A J Murrills, E Dennison, G Pearson, C Cooper.   

Abstract

This paper describes a study to assess the clinical value of bilateral femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Although a range of factors will determine clinical decisions, the classification of the site with the lowest T-score is likely to have significant bearing on the management of a patient. While it is common practice to measure BMD at the lumbar spine and a single neck of femur, knowledge of the BMD of the second femur may also be of diagnostic value. Using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, BMD of the lumbar spine and right and left femoral neck was measured in a group of 2372 white, Caucasian women (mean age +/- SD, 56.6 +/- 13.9 years) routinely referred for bone densitometry. Analysis of the measurements showed a significant (p = 0.02) but small difference between the mean BMD of the right (0.840 +/- 0.152 g/cm2) and left (0.837 +/- 0.150 g/cm2) femoral neck. Further investigation of femur scans revealed 79 (3.3%) patients in whom one side was osteoporotic while the other side and spine were normal or osteopenic using the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria in combination with manufacturer's reference data. Patients in whom the femoral neck BMD measurements differed by less than the precision error of the system were then excluded. This left only 51 (2.2%) patients, that is 29 (1.2%) for right femur and spine scan and 22 (0.9%) for left femur and spine scan, in whom knowledge of both femoral neck BMD measurements could have altered the classification of the lowest site assessed to osteoporotic. These data suggest that there is only a small benefit from performing bilateral femoral neck BMD measurements. Since BMD measurements are only one of a range of factors considered as part of a patient's management, it is suggested that the extra time, cost and radiation dose associated with measurement of the second femur may not be justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11095170     DOI: 10.1007/s001980070065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  12 in total

1.  The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density.

Authors:  R Hamdy; G M Kiebzak; E Seier; N B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Changes in bone mineral density of both proximal femurs after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kwang Kyoun Kim; Ye Yeon Won; Youn Moo Heo; Dae Hee Lee; Jeong Yong Yoon; Won Sub Sung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-02-14

3.  Transient osteoporosis of the hip: successful treatment with teriparatide.

Authors:  Gianluigi Fabbriciani; Matteo Pirro; Maria Rosaria Manfredelli; Massimo Bianchi; Silvio Sivolella; Anna Maria Scarponi; Elmo Mannarino
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  Underestimated fracture probability in patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis as calculated by FRAX.

Authors:  Nithya Setty; Meryl S Leboff; Thomas S Thornhill; Giulia Rinaldi; Julie Glowacki
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Left-right differences in the proximal femur's strength of post-menopausal women: a multicentric finite element study.

Authors:  F Taddei; C Falcinelli; L Balistreri; P Henys; F Baruffaldi; S Sigurdsson; V Gudnason; T B Harris; R Dietzel; G Armbrecht; S Boutroy; E Schileo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The prevalence of significant left-right hip bone mineral density differences among black and white women.

Authors:  J D Alele; D L Kamen; K L Hermayer; J Fernandes; J Soule; M Ebeling; T C Hulsey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Association of incident hip fracture with the estimated femoral strength by finite element analysis of DXA scans in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.

Authors:  L Yang; N Parimi; E S Orwoll; D M Black; J T Schousboe; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Differences in bone mineral density between the right and left hips in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Hwang; Si Young Park; Soon Hyuck Lee; Seung Bum Han; Kyung Han Ro
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Prediction of incident hip fracture with the estimated femoral strength by finite element analysis of DXA Scans in the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Lang Yang; Lisa Palermo; Dennis M Black; Richard Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density.

Authors:  M K Garg; Sandeep Kharb
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.