G N Brooks-Carter1, M A Killackey, R S Neuwirth. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, New York, New York 10019, USA. gizellewells@mciworld.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endometrial ablation is a relatively new technique for treating abnormal uterine bleeding not associated with malignancy. Long-term outcome data after endometrial ablation are limited, and incidence of endometrial adenocarcinoma after ablation is unknown. CASE: A 55-year-old black woman who had endometrial ablation for abnormal uterine bleeding after excluding uterine cancer presented 5 years later with similar symptoms and a histologic diagnosis of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the uterus. She refused surgery and had radiation treatment for probable stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: It is unlikely in this high-risk patient that the endometrial ablation masked an undetected malignancy or delayed the diagnosis. Given the interval, the adenocarcinoma might have occurred de novo.
BACKGROUND: Endometrial ablation is a relatively new technique for treating abnormal uterine bleeding not associated with malignancy. Long-term outcome data after endometrial ablation are limited, and incidence of endometrial adenocarcinoma after ablation is unknown. CASE: A 55-year-old black woman who had endometrial ablation for abnormal uterine bleeding after excluding uterine cancer presented 5 years later with similar symptoms and a histologic diagnosis of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the uterus. She refused surgery and had radiation treatment for probable stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: It is unlikely in this high-risk patient that the endometrial ablation masked an undetected malignancy or delayed the diagnosis. Given the interval, the adenocarcinoma might have occurred de novo.
Authors: Robert L Dood; Clarisa R Gracia; Mary D Sammel; Kevin Haynes; Suneeta Senapati; Brian L Strom Journal: J Minim Invasive Gynecol Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 4.137