Literature DB >> 11093695

Family reports of barriers to optimal care of the dying.

S W Tolle1, V P Tilden, A G Rosenfeld, S E Hickman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In response to intense national pressure to improve care of the dying, efforts have been made to determine problems or barriers to optimal care. However, prior research is limited by such factors as setting, focus, and sampling.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to optimal care of a population-based representative sample of decedents across a full range of settings in which death occurred.
METHODS: Families were contacted 2 to 5 months after decedents' deaths by using data on their death certificates. Over a 14-month period, telephone interviews were conducted with 475 family informants who had been involved in caring for the patient in the last month of life. Interviews were standardized by use of a 58-item structured questionnaire.
RESULTS: Data show a high frequency of advance planning (68%) and a high level of respect by clinicians for patient-family preferences about end-of-life location and treatment decisions. Family satisfaction with care was generally high, even though pain was a problem in one third of the sample of decedents.
CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to optimal care of the dying remain, despite a generally positive overall profile; barriers include level of pain and management of pain, as well as some dissatisfaction with physician availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11093695     DOI: 10.1097/00006199-200011000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  12 in total

1.  End-of-Life Decision Making and Communication of Bereaved Family Members of African Americans with Serious Illness.

Authors:  Esther R Smith-Howell; Susan E Hickman; Salimah H Meghani; Susan M Perkins; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Assessing families in palliative care: a pilot study of the checklist of family relational abilities.

Authors:  Victoria M Wilkins; Timothy E Quill; Deborah A King
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Family reports of pain in dying hospitalized patients: a structured telephone survey.

Authors:  S W Tolle; V P Tilden; S E Hickman; A G Rosenfeld
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-06

Review 4.  Factors associated with congruence between preferred and actual place of death.

Authors:  Christina L Bell; Emese Somogyi-Zalud; Kamal H Masaki
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Discharge planning for palliative care patients: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Emma Benzar; Lissi Hansen; Anna W Kneitel; Erik K Fromme
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Where do you want to spend your last days of life? Low concordance between preferred and actual site of death among hospitalized adults.

Authors:  Stacy Fischer; Sung-Joon Min; Lilia Cervantes; Jean Kutner
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.960

7.  Intensive care unit cultures and end-of-life decision making.

Authors:  Judith Gedney Baggs; Sally A Norton; Madeline H Schmitt; Mary T Dombeck; Craig R Sellers; Jill R Quinn
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 3.425

8.  Pain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a neglected aspect of disease.

Authors:  Chalonda R Handy; Christina Krudy; Nicholas Boulis; Thais Federici
Journal:  Neurol Res Int       Date:  2011-05-03

9.  Gene therapy: a potential approach for cancer pain.

Authors:  Chalonda R Handy; Christina Krudy; Nicholas Boulis
Journal:  Pain Res Treat       Date:  2011-06-09

10.  Paraplegia after intercostal neurolysis with phenol.

Authors:  Lakshman Gollapalli; Rudramanaidu Muppuri
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.